Numerical simulation and biomechanical analysis of locking screw caps on clavicle locking plates

被引:5
作者
Kim, Dae-Geun [1 ]
Kim, Soo Min [2 ]
Kim, Yoonkap [2 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Gumi Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Gumi, South Korea
[2] Gumi Elect & Informat Technol Res Inst GERI, Convergence Mat Res Ctr, Innovat Technol Res Div, Gumi, South Korea
关键词
bone plate; clavicle; finite element analysis; fracture fixation; locking screw cap; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT; FRACTURES; FIXATION; METAANALYSIS; SUPERIOR; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000029319
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The risk of displaced and comminuted midshaft clavicle fractures is increased in high-energy traumas such as sport injuries and traffic accidents. Open reduction and plate fixation have been widely used for midshaft clavicle fractures. Among various plates for clavicle shaft fractures, superior locking compression plates (LCPs) have been mostly used. In plate fixation, nonunion caused by implant failure is the most difficult complication. The most common reasons for metal plate failure are excessive stress and stress concentration caused by cantilever bending. These causes were easily addressed using a locking screw cap (LSC). Methods: The clavicle 3-dimensional image was made from a computed tomography scan, and the clavicle midshaft fracture model was generated with a 10-mm interval. The fracture model was fixed with a superior LCP, and finite element analysis was conducted between the presence (with LSC model) and absence (without LSC model) of an LSC on the site of the fracture. The stresses of screw holes in models with and without LSCs were measured under 3 forces: 100 N cantilever bending force, 100 N axial compression force, and 1 N center dot m axial torsion force. After the finite element analysis, a validation test was conducted on the cantilever bending force known as the greatest force applied to superior locking plates. Results: The mean greatest stress under the cantilever bending force was significantly greater than other loading forces. The highest stress site was the screw hole edge on the fracture site in both models under the cantilever bending and axial compression forces. Under the axial torsional force, the maximum stress point was the lateral first screw hole edge. The ultimate plate stress of the with LSC model is completely lower than that of the without LSC model. According to the validation test, the stiffness, ultimate load, and yield load of the with LSC model were higher than those of the without LSC model. Conclusions: Therefore, inserting an LSC into an empty screw hole in the fracture area reduces the maximum stress on an LCP and improves biomechanical stability.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   What Is the Best Evidence for Management of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of 22 Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Axelrod, Daniel E. ;
Ekhtiari, Seper ;
Bozzo, Anthony ;
Bhandari, Mohit ;
Johal, Herman .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 478 (02) :392-402
[2]   Comparison of implant failure rates of different plates for midshaft clavicular fractures based on fracture classifications [J].
Chiu, Yung-Cheng ;
Huang, Kui-Chou ;
Shih, Cheng-Min ;
Lee, Kun-Tsan ;
Chen, Kun-Hui ;
Hsu, Cheng-En .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (1)
[3]   Conceptual finite element study for comparison among superior, anterior, and spiral clavicle plate fixations for midshaft clavicle fracture [J].
Huang, Teng-Le ;
Chen, Wen-Chuan ;
Lin, Kun-Jhih ;
Tsai, Cheng-Lun ;
Lin, Kang-Ping ;
Wei, Hung-Wen .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2016, 38 (10) :1070-1075
[4]   Clavicle nonunion and plate breakage after locking compression plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures [J].
Huang, Xiaoyan ;
Xiao, Haijun ;
Xue, Feng .
EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2020, 19 (01) :308-312
[5]   Effects of plate location and selection on the stability of midshaft clavicle osteotomies: A biomechanical study [J].
Iannotti, MR ;
Crosby, LA ;
Stafford, P ;
Grayson, G ;
Goulet, R .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2002, 11 (05) :457-462
[6]   Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Complex Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Jia, Zhiwei ;
Li, Wei ;
Qin, Yingyi ;
Li, Haifeng ;
Wang, Deli ;
Zhang, Chao ;
He, Qing ;
Ruan, Dike .
ORTHOPEDICS, 2014, 37 (06) :E543-E551
[7]   Conservative treatment of fractures at the middle third of the clavicle: The relevance of shortening and clinical outcome [J].
Lazarides, S ;
Zafiropoulos, G .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2006, 15 (02) :191-194
[8]   Strength analysis of clavicle fracture fixation devices and fixation techniques using finite element analysis with musculoskeletal force input [J].
Marie, Cronskar .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2015, 53 (08) :759-769
[9]   Construct failure after open reduction and plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures [J].
Meeuwis, M. A. ;
ter Gunne, A. F. Pull ;
Verhofstad, M. H. J. ;
van der Heijden, F. H. W. M. .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2017, 48 (03) :715-719
[10]  
NORDQVIST A, 1994, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P127