Safety of ultrasound contrast agents

被引:118
作者
Jakobsen, JÅ
Oyen, R
Thomsen, HS
Morcos, SK
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol 54E2, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[2] Rikshosp Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Oslo, Norway
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Radiol, Louvain, Belgium
[4] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, No Gen Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Sheffield S5 7AU, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
contrast media; ultrasound contrast agents; adverse events; risk factors; guidelines; treatment;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-004-2601-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The use of ultrasound contrast agents has increased over recent years. The Contrast Media Safety Committee (CMSC) of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) decided to review the safety of ultrasound contrast agents in humans and to draw up guidelines. A comprehensive literature search and review was carried out. The resulting report was discussed by the CMSC of ESUR and at the 11th European Symposium on Urogenital Radiology in Santiago de Compostela, Spain, in 2004. Ultrasound contrast agents approved for clinical use are well tolerated, and serious adverse reactions are rarely observed. Adverse events are usually minor (e.g. headache, nausea, altered taste, sensation of heat) and self-resolving. These symptoms may not be related to the ultrasound contrast materials as they have also been observed in placebo-control groups. Intolerance to some components may occur. Generalized allergy-like reactions occur rarely. Ultrasound contrast agents are generally safe. The ultrasound scanning time and the acoustic output should be kept to the lowest level consistent with obtaining diagnostic information. Adverse reactions should be treated symptomatically.
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 945
页数:5
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Clinical safety of SonoVue™, a new contrast agent for ultrasound imaging, in healthy volunteers and in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [J].
Bokor, D ;
Chambers, JB ;
Rees, PJ ;
Mant, TGK ;
Luzzani, F ;
Spinazzi, A .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2001, 36 (02) :104-109
[2]   Does contrast echocardiography with Optison induce myocardial necrosis in humans? [J].
Borges, AC ;
Walde, T ;
Reibis, RK ;
Grohmann, A ;
Ziebig, R ;
Rutsch, W ;
Schimke, I ;
Baumann, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2002, 15 (10) :1080-1086
[3]   Acoustic cavitation nuclei survive the apparent ultrasonic destruction of Albunex(R) microspheres [J].
Brayman, AA ;
Miller, MW .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 23 (05) :793-796
[4]   Pulse inversion imaging of liver blood flow - Improved method for characterizing focal masses with microbubble contrast [J].
Burns, PN ;
Wilson, SR ;
Simpson, DH .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (01) :58-71
[5]  
BURNS PN, 1996, CLIN RADIOL, V51, pS50
[6]   LYSIS OF ERYTHROCYTES BY EXPOSURE TO CW ULTRASOUND [J].
CARSTENSEN, EL ;
KELLY, P ;
CHURCH, CC ;
BRAYMAN, AA ;
CHILD, SZ ;
RAEMAN, CH ;
SCHERY, L .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1993, 19 (02) :147-165
[7]   Bioeffects of myocardial contrast microbubble destruction by echocardiography [J].
Chen, SY ;
Kroll, MH ;
Shohet, RV ;
Frenkel, P ;
Mayer, SA ;
Grayburn, PA .
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2002, 19 (06) :495-500
[8]   Renal arteries in patients at risk of renal arterial stenosis: Multicenter evaluation of the echo-enhancer SHU 508A at color and spectral Doppler US [J].
Claudon, M ;
Plouin, PF ;
Baxter, GM ;
Rohban, T ;
Devos, DM .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (03) :739-746
[9]   Improved left ventricular endocardial border delineation and opacification with OPTISON (FS069), a new echocardiographic contrast agent - Results of a phase III multicenter trial [J].
Cohen, JL ;
Cheirif, J ;
Segar, DS ;
Gillam, LD ;
Gottdiener, JS ;
Hausnerova, E ;
Bruns, DE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 32 (03) :746-752
[10]   Ultrasound contrast agents:: properties, principles of action, tolerance, and artifacts [J].
Correas, JM ;
Bridal, L ;
Lesavre, A ;
Méjean, A ;
Claudon, M ;
Hélénon, O .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (08) :1316-1328