Preoperative assessment of lung cancer patients before lung resection

被引:2
作者
Charloux, A.
机构
[1] Hop Univ, Serv Physiol & Explorat Fonct, F-67091 Strasbourg, France
[2] Univ Strasbourg 1, Fac Med, Inst Physiol, EA 3072, Strasbourg, France
关键词
lung cancer; surgery; lung function testing; exercise testing; preoperative assessment;
D O I
10.1019/200720129
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of the functional evaluation of lung cancer patients before lung resection is to evaluate the risk of peri-operative cardio-respiratory complications. The successive steps of the functional assessment are determined according to the predictive value, the invasiveness, and the sophistication of the tests. The cardiovascular risk is evaluated using clinical predictors and ECG findings. If both are negative, the first step of the respiratory function assessment will be FEV1 measurement. Simultaneous measurement of CO diffusing lung capacity (D-LCO), which has a high predictive value of complications, is highly recommended by some authors. The second and the third steps will be either exercise testing or split function studies based on quantitative perfusion scan results,the position of the test in the algorithm depending on the authors. Formal exercise testing has been found to be the best predictor of postoperative complications in several studies. However, it does not evaluate the functional contribution of the parenchyma to be resected, which required a perfusion scan. On the other hand, patients with low values of predicted post-operative FEV1 or D-LCO should undergo exercise tests. Eventually, clinical, surgical and anesthetic factors should also be taken into account in addition to the functional evaluation to assess the perioperative risk of the patient.
引用
收藏
页码:S50 / S58
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   The physiologic evaluation of patients with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery [J].
Beckles, MA ;
Spiro, SG ;
Colice, GL ;
Rudd, RM .
CHEST, 2003, 123 (01) :105S-114S
[2]   Charlson comorbidity index as a predictor of long-term outcome after surgery for nonsmall cell lung cancer [J].
Birim, Ö ;
Kappetein, AP ;
Bogers, AJJC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 28 (05) :759-762
[3]   Preoperative assessment for lung cancer surgery [J].
Bolliger, CT ;
Koegelenberg, CFN ;
Kendal, R .
CURRENT OPINION IN PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2005, 11 (04) :301-306
[4]  
BOLLIGER CT, 1994, RESPIRATION, V61, P181
[5]   Functional evaluation of the lung resection candidate [J].
Bolliger, CT ;
Perruchoud, AP .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1998, 11 (01) :198-212
[6]   Stair climbing test predicts cardiopulmonary complications after lung resection [J].
Brunelli, A ;
Al Refai, M ;
Monteverde, M ;
Borri, A ;
Salati, M ;
Fianchini, A .
CHEST, 2002, 121 (04) :1106-1110
[7]   Controle of peri-operative smoking: A challenge for the pneumologists [J].
Dautzenberg, B ;
Riquet, M ;
Trosini-Desert, V .
REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES, 2005, 22 (06) :1085-1089
[8]   ACC/AHA 2006 guideline update on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery: Focused update on perioperative beta-blocker therapy [J].
Fleisher, Lee A. ;
Beckman, Joshua A. ;
Brown, Kenneth A. ;
Calkins, Hugh ;
Chaikof, Elliott ;
Fleischmann, Kirsten E. ;
Freeman, William K. ;
Froehlich, James B. ;
Kasper, Edward K. ;
Kersten, Judy R. ;
Riegel, Barbara ;
Robb, John F. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (11) :2343-2355
[9]  
Fountain SW, 2001, THORAX, V56, P89
[10]   Lung cancer surgery: acceptable morbidity and mortality, expected results and quality control [J].
Ginsberg, RJ .
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2002, 11 (04) :263-266