Improved sequentially linear solution procedure

被引:32
作者
Elias, Jan [1 ]
Frantik, Petr [1 ]
Vorechovsky, Miroslav [1 ]
机构
[1] Brno Univ Technol, Inst Struct Mech, Fac Civil Engn, Brno 60200, Czech Republic
关键词
Sequentially linear procedure; Elasto-brittle elements; Non-proportional load-path; Stress redistribution; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; FRACTURE; LATTICE; MODEL; AVALANCHES; BUNDLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.05.018
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
The article proposes an improvement over the widely used sequentially linear solution procedure often utilized for fracture simulations. In the classical secant version of this method, a partial solution of a step is scaled to reach a stress limit in exactly one element and the mechanical properties of the critical element are reduced. Non-proportional loading is generally unfeasible due to avalanches of ruptures caused by stress redistribution. Because only one loading vector can be scaled at a time, all others have to remain constant during the step. However, the constant load vectors do not allow proper determination of the critical element. A modified procedure based on redistribution of released stresses is developed here. It preserves the linearity of each step. After rupture of the critical element, a sequentially linear redistribution process of stress release takes place until a static equilibrium state is reached. During the redistribution, other elements may break. The proposed enhanced sequential procedure is also compared with another recently published "event-by-event" linear method for non-proportional loading. It is shown here, with the help of simple examples, that the proposed redistribution method yields correct results for non-proportional loading, unlike the other methods under comparison. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2263 / 2276
页数:14
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Statistical models of fracture [J].
Alava, Mikko J. ;
Nukalaz, Phani K. V. V. ;
Zapperi, Stefano .
ADVANCES IN PHYSICS, 2006, 55 (3-4) :349-476
[2]   Fracture analyses using spring networks with random geometry [J].
Bolander, JE ;
Saito, S .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 1998, 61 (5-6) :569-591
[3]   Fracture in concrete specimens of differing scale [J].
Bolander, JE ;
Hikosaka, H ;
He, WJ .
ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 1998, 15 (08) :1094-+
[4]  
Buchanan M, 2002, Ubiquity: Why catastrophes happen
[5]   Sequentially linear analysis of fracture under non-proportional loading [J].
DeJong, Matthew J. ;
Hendriks, Max A. N. ;
Rots, Jan G. .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2008, 75 (18) :5042-5056
[6]  
Elias J., 2009, THESIS BRNO U TECHNO
[7]   Energy release control for numerical simulations of failure in quasi-brittle solids [J].
Gutiérrez, MA .
COMMUNICATIONS IN NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2004, 20 (01) :19-29
[8]   BURST AVALANCHES IN BUNDLES OF FIBERS - LOCAL VERSUS GLOBAL LOAD-SHARING [J].
HANSEN, A ;
HEMMER, PC .
PHYSICS LETTERS A, 1994, 184 (06) :394-396
[9]   THE DISTRIBUTION OF SIMULTANEOUS FIBER FAILURES IN FIBER-BUNDLES [J].
HEMMER, PC ;
HANSEN, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1992, 59 (04) :909-914
[10]   FRACTURE OF DISORDERED, ELASTIC LATTICES IN 2 DIMENSIONS [J].
HERRMANN, HJ ;
HANSEN, A ;
ROUX, S .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1989, 39 (01) :637-648