Efficient chemical and enzymatic saccharification of the lignocellulosic residue from Agave tequilana bagasse to produce ethanol by Pichia caribbica

被引:86
作者
Saucedo-Luna, Jaime [1 ,2 ]
Jaime Castro-Montoya, Agustin [2 ]
Manuel Martinez-Pacheco, Mauro [1 ]
Ruben Sosa-Aguirre, Carlos [1 ]
Campos-Garcia, Jesus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michoacana, Inst Invest Quim Biol, Morelia 58030, Michoacan, Mexico
[2] Univ Michoacana, Fac Ingn Quim, Morelia 58030, Michoacan, Mexico
关键词
Lignocellulose residue; Acid hydrolysis; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Fermentation alcoholic; Agave tequilana; Pichia caribbica; BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION; BETA-GLUCOSIDASE; HYDROLYSIS; XYLOSE; FERMENTATION; CELLULASE; SUGARCANE; CARBON;
D O I
10.1007/s10295-010-0853-z
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Bagasse of Agave tequilana (BAT) is the residual lignocellulosic waste that remains from tequila production. In this study we characterized the chemical composition of BAT, which was further saccharified and fermented to produce ethanol. BAT was constituted by cellulose (42%), hemicellulose (20%), lignin (15%), and other (23%). Saccharification of BAT was carried out at 147A degrees C with 2% sulfuric acid for 15 min, yielding 25.8 g/l of fermentable sugars, corresponding to 36.1% of saccharificable material (cellulose and hemicellulose contents, w/w). The remaining lignocellulosic material was further hydrolyzed by commercial enzymes, similar to 8.2% of BAT load was incubated for 72 h at 40A degrees C rendering 41 g/l of fermentable sugars corresponding to 73.6% of the saccharificable material (w/w). Mathematic surface response analysis of the acid and enzymatic BAT hydrolysis was used for process optimization. The results showed a satisfactory correlation (R-2 = 0.90) between the obtained and predicted responses. The native yeast Pichia caribbica UM-5 was used to ferment sugar liquors from both acid and enzymatic hydrolysis to ethanol yielding 50 and 87%, respectively. The final optimized process generated 8.99 g ethanol/50 g of BAT, corresponding to an overall 56.75% of theoretical ethanol (w/w). Thus, BAT may be employed as a lignocellulosic raw material for bioethanol production and can contribute to BAT residue elimination from environment.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 732
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Production of levulinic acid and use as a platform chemical for derived products [J].
Bozell, JJ ;
Moens, L ;
Elliott, DC ;
Wang, Y ;
Neuenscwander, GG ;
Fitzpatrick, SW ;
Bilski, RJ ;
Jarnefeld, JL .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2000, 28 (3-4) :227-239
[2]  
BRINK ROBERT H., 1960, SOIL SCI, V89, P157, DOI 10.1097/00010694-196003000-00006
[3]  
Cedeno-Cruz M., 2003, The alcohol textbook, V4, P223
[4]   Comparative hydrolysis and fermentation of sugarcane and agave bagasse [J].
Hernandez-Salas, J. M. ;
Villa-Ramirez, M. S. ;
Veloz-Rendon, J. S. ;
Rivera-Hernandez, K. N. ;
Gonzalez-Cesar, R. A. ;
Plascencia-Espinosa, M. A. ;
Trejo-Estrada, S. R. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (03) :1238-1245
[5]  
Kaar WE, 1998, BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V59, P419, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980820)59:4<419::AID-BIT4>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-J
[7]   Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update [J].
Lynd, LR ;
van Zyl, WH ;
McBride, JE ;
Laser, M .
CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2005, 16 (05) :577-583
[8]   Comparison of the fermentability of enzymatic hydrolyzates of sugarcane bagasse pretreated by steam explosion using different impregnating agents [J].
Martín, C ;
Galbe, M ;
Nilvebrant, NO ;
Jönsson, LJ .
APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2002, 98 (1-9) :699-716
[9]   Bioethanol production from xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing xylose reductase, NADP+-dependent xylitol dehydrogenase, and xylulokinase [J].
Matsushika, Akinori ;
Watanabe, Seiya ;
Kodaki, Tsutomu ;
Makino, Keisuke ;
Sawayama, Shigeki .
JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING, 2008, 105 (03) :296-299
[10]   CARBON SOURCE CONTROL OF CELLOBIOHYDROLASE-I AND CELLOBIOHYDROLASE-II FORMATION BY TRICHODERMA-REESEI [J].
MESSNER, R ;
KUBICEK, CP .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1991, 57 (03) :630-635