Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: The role of spectral resolution and smearing

被引:160
作者
Fu, QJ [1 ]
Nogaki, G [1 ]
机构
[1] House Ear Res Inst, Dept Auditory Implants & Percept, Los Angeles, CA 90057 USA
来源
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY | 2005年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词
noise susceptibility; cochlear implants; spectral resolution; spectral smearing; gated noise;
D O I
10.1007/s10162-004-5024-3
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The latest-generation cochlear implant devices provide many deaf patients with good speech recognition in quiet listening conditions. However, speech recognition deteriorates rapidly as the level of background noise increases. Previous studies have shown that, for cochlear implant users, the absence of fine spectro-temporal cries may contribute to poorer performance in noise, especially Mien the noise is dynamic (e.g., competing speaker or modulated noise). Here we report on sentence recognition by cochlear implant users and by normal-hearing subjects listening to an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant, in the presence of stead), or square-wave modulated speech-shaped noise. Implant users were tested using their everyday, clinically assigned speech processors. In the acoustic simulation, normal-hearing listeners were tested for different degrees of spectral resolution (16, eight, or four channels) and spectral smearing (carrier filter slopes of -24 or -6 dB/octave). For Modulated noise, normal-hearing listeners experienced significant release from masking when the original, unprocessed speech was presented (which preserved the spectro-temporal fine structure), while cochlear implant users experienced no release from masking. As the spectral resolution was reduced, normal-hearing listeners release from masking gradually diminished. Release from masking was further reduced as the degree of spectral smearing increased. Interestingly, the mean speech recognition thresholds of implant users were very close to those of normal-hearing subjects listening to four-channel spectrally smeared noise-band speech. Also, the best cochlear implant listeners performed like normal-hearing subjects listening to eight- to 16-channel spectrally smeared noise-band speech. These findings Suggest that implant users' susceptibility to noise may be caused by the reduced spectral resolution and the high degree of spectral smearing associated with channel interaction. Efforts to improve the effective number of spectral channels as well as reduce channel interactions May improve implant performance in noise, especially for temporally modulated noise.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 27
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds [J].
Bacon, SP ;
Opie, JM ;
Montoya, DY .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1998, 41 (03) :549-563
[2]   EFFECTS OF SPECTRAL SMEARING ON THE INTELLIGIBILITY OF SENTENCES IN THE PRESENCE OF INTERFERING SPEECH [J].
BAER, T ;
MOORE, BCJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1994, 95 (04) :2277-2280
[3]   EFFECTS OF SPECTRAL SMEARING ON THE INTELLIGIBILITY OF SENTENCES IN NOISE [J].
BAER, T ;
MOORE, BCJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1993, 94 (03) :1229-1241
[4]   Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognition [J].
Boothroyd, A ;
Mulhearn, B ;
Gong, J ;
Ostroff, J .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1996, 100 (03) :1807-1818
[5]   SPEECH-PERCEPTION USING A 2-FORMANT 22-ELECTRODE COCHLEAR PROSTHESIS IN QUIET AND IN NOISE [J].
DOWELL, RC ;
SELIGMAN, PM ;
BLAMEY, PJ ;
CLARK, GM .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 1987, 104 (5-6) :439-446
[6]   SPEECH RECOGNITION IN AMPLITUDE-MODULATED NOISE OF LISTENERS WITH NORMAL AND LISTENERS WITH IMPAIRED HEARING [J].
EISENBERG, LS ;
DIRKS, DD ;
BELL, TS .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1995, 38 (01) :222-233
[7]   EFFECTS OF FLUCTUATING NOISE AND INTERFERING SPEECH ON THE SPEECH-RECEPTION THRESHOLD FOR IMPAIRED AND NORMAL HEARING [J].
FESTEN, JM ;
PLOMP, R .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1990, 88 (04) :1725-1736
[8]   Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearing [J].
Fu, QJ ;
Shannon, RV ;
Wang, XS .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1998, 104 (06) :3586-3596
[9]   MASKING OF SPEECH BY AMPLITUDE-MODULATED NOISE [J].
GUSTAFSSON, HA ;
ARLINGER, SD .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1994, 95 (01) :518-529
[10]   SOME EFFECTS OF AUDITORY GROUPING FACTORS ON MODULATION DETECTION INTERFERENCE (MDI) [J].
HALL, JW ;
GROSE, JH .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1991, 90 (06) :3028-3035