Public participation in strategic environmental assessment (SEA): Critical review and the Quebec (Canada) approach

被引:60
作者
Gauthier, Mario [1 ]
Simard, Louis [2 ]
Waaub, Jean-Philippe [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Outaouais, Dept Social Work & Social Sci, Gatineau, PQ J8X 3X7, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Sch Polit Studies, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[3] Univ Quebec Montreal, Grp Etudes Interdisciplinaires Geog & Environm Re, Dept Geog, Stn Ctr Ville Montreal, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
关键词
Strategic environmental assessment; Public participation; Quebec (Canada); SYSTEMS; PLANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
It is widely accepted that public participation must be a part of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) procedures, and yet few studies have been conducted on the implementation of SEA public participation procedures. Accordingly, the theoretical and practical aspects of public participation in SEA remain research priorities for environmental policy-making. This paper presents a review of the Quebec (Canada) model of public participation in SEA through an evaluation of six public hearings on proposed directions and policies concerning, respectively, hazardous waste, forest protection, residual materials, energy, water management and pig farming. First, the authors examine the theoretical dimensions of SEA and public participation in the process. Second, they give a summary of the lessons that can be learned from the few Canadian and international experiences. Third, they outline the Quebec experience. Finally, they conclude by evaluating the opportunities and limitations of the Quebec experience and make some recommendations to improve its application. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 60
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Measurement indicators and an evaluation approach for assessing Strategic Environmental Assessment effectiveness [J].
Wang, Huizhi ;
Bai, Hongtao ;
Liu, Jia ;
Xu, He .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 23 :413-420
[22]   A public participation approach in the environmental governance of industrial parks [J].
Wang, Yuanni ;
Zhang, Ruilian ;
Zhao, Yazhou ;
Li, Chunhua .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 101
[23]   Promise and dismay: The state of strategic environmental assessment systems and practices in Canada [J].
Noble, Bram F. .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2009, 29 (01) :66-75
[24]   Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment in Germany? - meta-review of SEA research in the light of effectiveness dimensions [J].
Geissler, Gesa ;
Rehhausen, Anke ;
Fischer, Thomas B. ;
Hanusch, Marie .
IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2019, 37 (3-4) :219-232
[25]   A review of strategic environmental assessment in 12 selected countries [J].
Chaker, A ;
El-Fadl, K ;
Chamas, L ;
Hatjian, B .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2006, 26 (01) :15-56
[26]   The Impact of Public Participation on the Environmental Impact Assessment of Marine Engineering [J].
Li, Shizheng ;
Zhang, Xiaoxue ;
Ding, Zhongming .
JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2020, :479-483
[27]   Public participation in environmental impact assessment - implementing the Aarhus Convention [J].
Hartley, N ;
Wood, C .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2005, 25 (04) :319-340
[28]   Public participation in environmental impact assessment: why, who and how? [J].
Glucker, Anne N. ;
Driessen, Peter P. J. ;
Kolhoff, Arend ;
Runhaar, Hens A. C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2013, 43 :104-111
[29]   Retrospect and prospect: Public participation in environmental impact assessment in China [J].
Gao, Qi .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 101
[30]   Access to information and the role of environmental assessment registries for public participation [J].
Odparlik, Lisa F. ;
Koeppel, Johann .
IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2013, 31 (04) :324-331