Artificial Bowel Sphincter Implantation for Faecal Incontinence in Asian Patients

被引:15
作者
Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak [1 ]
Koh, Dean C. [1 ]
Seah, Aileen A. [1 ]
Cheong, Wai-Kit [1 ]
Tsang, Charles B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Div Colorectal Surg, Dept Surg, Singapore 119072, Singapore
关键词
Action; artificial bowel sphincter; Asians; faecal incontinence; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ANAL-SPHINCTER; COMPLICATIONS; NEOSPHINCTER; INSTITUTION; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/S1015-9584(10)60023-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the outcomes with the American Medical Systems artificial bowel sphincter (ABS) implantation for the treatment of intractable faecal incontinence in an Asian population. METHODS: Six Asian patients who underwent ABS implantation between March 2004 and December 2007 for the treatment of faecal incontinence were reviewed. RESULTS: The ABS was successfully implanted in six patients [mean age SO (20-73) years; 4 males]. The most common causes of incontinence were congenital anomaly of the anus (imperforate anus status post a pull-through procedure) and status-post ultralow anterior resection. Two patients required device explantation due to postoperative infection. One eventually required a colostomy. After a mean follow-up of 22 (4-36) months, four patients continued to have a functional artificial bowel sphincter. Faecal incontinence severity scores improved from a mean of 13 (12-14) to 6 (0-9) postactivation. Anal manometry showed an increase in mean resting pressures (19.2 +/- 7.5 mmHg vs. postirnplantation with cuff inflated 45.0 +/- 12.0 mmHg). The comparative preoperative and postactivation faecal incontinence quality of life scores showed improvement in all aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with successful ABS implantation benefited from improved outcomes in function and quality of life. Infection was the most common cause of failure in our patients. [Asian J Surg 2010;33(3):134-42]
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 142
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Multicentre retrospective analysis of the outcome of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe faecal incontinence
    Altomare, DF
    Dodi, G
    La Torre, F
    Romano, G
    Melega, E
    Rinaldi, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (11) : 1481 - 1486
  • [2] Neosphincter surgery for fecal incontinence:: A critical and unbiased review of the relevant literature
    Belyaev, O
    Müller, C
    Uhl, W
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2006, 36 (04) : 295 - 303
  • [3] BROWN SR, 2007, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V2, P1757, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD00157.PUB2
  • [4] Casal E, 2004, Colorectal Dis, V6, P180, DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00609.x
  • [5] CHRISTIANSEN J, 1987, LANCET, V2, P244
  • [6] Christiansen J, 2000, Can J Gastroenterol, V14 Suppl D, p152D
  • [7] Artificial anal sphincter -: Complications and functional results of a large personal series
    Devesa, JM
    Rey, A
    Hervas, PL
    Halawa, KS
    Larrañaga, I
    Svidler, L
    Abraira, V
    Muriel, A
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2002, 45 (09) : 1154 - 1163
  • [8] Comparison of quality of life and anorectal function after artificial sphincter implantation
    Lehur, PA
    Zerbib, F
    Neunlist, M
    Glemain, P
    des Varannes, SB
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2002, 45 (04) : 508 - 513
  • [9] Outcome of patients with an implanted artificial anal sphincter for severe faecal incontinence - A single institution report
    Lehur, PA
    Glemain, P
    des Varannes, SB
    Buzelin, JM
    Leborgne, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1998, 13 (02) : 88 - 92
  • [10] Artificial anal sphincter - Prospective clinical and manometric evaluation
    Lehur, PA
    Roig, JV
    Duinslaeger, M
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2000, 43 (08) : 1100 - 1106