Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: Where are the methods?

被引:982
作者
Gilbert, EH [1 ]
Lowenstein, SR [1 ]
KoziolMcLain, J [1 ]
Barta, DC [1 ]
Steiner, J [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV COLORADO,HLTH SCI CTR,DIV EMERGENCY MED,COLORADO EMERGENCY MED RES CTR,DENVER,CO 80262
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0196-0644(96)70264-0
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Medical chart reviews are often used in emergency medicine research. However, the reliability of data abstracted by chart reviews is seldom examined critically The objective of this investigation was to determine the proportion of emergency medicine research articles that use data from chart reviews and the proportions that report methods of case selection, abstractor training, monitoring and blinding, and interrater agreement. Methods: Research articles published in three emergency medicine journals from January 1989 through December 1993 were identified. The articles that used chart reviews were analyzed. Results: Of 986 original research articles that were identified, 244 (25%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 22% to 28%) relied on chart reviews. Inclusion criteria were described in 98% (95% Cl, 96% to 99%), and 73% (95% Cl, 67% to 79%) defined the variables being analyzed. Other methods were seldom mentioned: abstractor training, 18% (95% Cl, 13% to 23%); standardized abstraction forms, 11% (95% Cl, 7% to 15%); periodic abstractor monitoring, 4% (95% Cl, 2% to 7%); and abstractor blinding to study hypotheses, 3% (95% Cl, 1% to 6%). Interrater reliability was mentioned in 5% (95% Cl, 3% to 9%) and tested statistically in .4% (95% Cl, 0% to 2%). A 15% random sample of articles was reassessed by a second investigator; interrater agreement was high for all eight criteria. Conclusion: Chart review is a common method of data collection in emergency medicine research. Yet, information about the quality of the data is usually lacking. Chart reviews should be held to higher methodologic standards, or the conclusions of these studies may be in error.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 308
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   OBSERVER VARIATION IN THE CLASSIFICATION OF INFORMATION FROM MEDICAL RECORDS [J].
BOYD, NF ;
PATER, JL ;
GINSBURG, AD ;
MYERS, RE .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1979, 32 (04) :327-332
[2]   THE MISINFORMATION ERA - THE FALL OF THE MEDICAL RECORD [J].
BURNUM, JF .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 110 (06) :482-484
[3]   A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PUBLICATIONS ON OBSERVER VARIABILITY (FINAL INSTALLMENT) [J].
ELMORE, JG ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (06) :567-580
[4]   EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CANCER THERAPY .4. EXTRACTION OF DATA FROM MEDICAL RECORDS [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR ;
PRITCHETT, JA ;
SCHIMPFF, CR .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1969, 123 (05) :571-+
[5]   EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CANCER THERAPY .3. MANAGEMENT OF IMPERFECT DATA [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR ;
PRITCHETT, JA ;
SCHIMPFF, CR .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1969, 123 (04) :448-+
[6]   HIGH AGREEMENT BUT LOW KAPPA .1. THE PROBLEMS OF 2 PARADOXES [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR ;
CICCHETTI, DV .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (06) :543-549
[7]   PATIENT-PHYSICIAN CONCORDANCE IN PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION IN THE PRIMARY CARE SETTING [J].
FREIDIN, RB ;
GOLDMAN, L ;
CECIL, RR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1980, 93 (03) :490-493
[8]   ASSESSING THE RELIABILITY OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC DATA OBTAINED FROM MEDICAL RECORDS [J].
HORWITZ, RI ;
YU, EC .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1984, 37 (11) :825-831
[9]   RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL METHODS, DATA AND JUDGMENTS .2. [J].
KORAN, LM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1975, 293 (14) :695-701
[10]   RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL METHODS, DATA AND JUDGMENTS .1. [J].
KORAN, LM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1975, 293 (13) :642-646