Acute Ischemic Stroke Outcome and Preceding Anticoagulation: Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists

Background and Purpose: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) severity and clinical course are less known in direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) users. We aimed to explore the outcome of AIS in patients pretreated with vitamin-K-antagonists (VKA) and DOAC. Methods: A retrospective study was performed. Patients pretreated with oral anticoagulants (OAC) for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation admitted for AIS in a stroke unit between 2016-01-01 and 2018-08-31 were included. The primary endpoint was mortality during the hospital stay, and secondary endpoints were neurologic improvement at stroke unit discharge and good functional outcome 90 days after AIS. Results: A total of 156 patients were included (83 on VKA and 73 on DOAC). Stroke severity (defined by NIHSS on admission) was comparable in both groups (AVK 13.0 [4.0-20.0] versus DOAC 11.0 [4.0-17.0], P = .435). Infratherapeutic levels and/or inappropriate low dose of OAC was also similar between groups (P = .152) and was not associated with stroke severity (P = .631) or mortality (P = .788). VKA (OR 12.616, P = .035, 95%CI 1.19-133.64) and PH2 hemorrhagic transformation (OR 7.516, P = .024, 95%CI 1.31-43.20) were associated with higher mortality in multivariate analysis. Higher stroke severity (OR .101, P < .001, 95%CI .037-.279) and VKA usage (OR .212, P = .003, 95%CI .08-.58) were associated with worse functional outcome at 3 months. Reperfusion therapy was significantly associated with neurologic improvement during stroke unit stay (OR 3.969, P = .009, 95%CI 1.42-11.11) but not with the functional outcome (P = .063). Conclusions: Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients pretreated with DOAC admitted for AIS had a better outcome when compared to VKA, although stroke severity was similar between groups.