Improved structure identification using tissue Doppler echocardiography

被引:0
|
作者
Bartel, T
Müller, S
Möhlenkamp, S
Bruch, C
Schaar, J
Erbel, R
机构
[1] Univ Essen Gesamthsch Klinikum, Abt Kardiol, Zentrum Innere Med, D-45122 Essen, Germany
[2] Univ Klin Innsbruck, Innere Med Klin, Klin Abt Kardiol, Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
tissue Doppler; endocarditis; clots; tumors; aortic plaques;
D O I
10.1007/BF03043757
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Tissue Doppler echocardiography (TDE) has been shown to be of particular value in patients with impaired myocardial function, Recently, the technique was successfully employed to localize the ventricular insertion of accessory atrioventricular pathways. The identification of abnormal cardiac structures is coming up now as a new field of clinical interest. The purpose of this study was to differentiate anomalous cardiac and aortic from native structures by physical properties of tissue motion using transesophageal TDE. Characteristic motion patterns of anomalous structures have not been described in detail and tissue Doppler findings have not been associated with clinical features up to now. Forty consecutive patients were included after anomalous cardiac or vascular structures had been detected by conventional transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). A control group consisted of 20 subjects. Rapidity of diagnosis in anomalous structures was divided into 3 categories, and TDE signals were related to particular pathology by a blinded, 2nd observer. Three different motion patterns could be defined: incoherent motion due to free oscillation of an anomalous structure which is independent of the surrounding tissue (Figure Ib); coherent motion with a phase difference meaning that motion depends on the motion of the surrounding tissue but is out of phase (Figure 2); concordant motion showing no difference in direction, velocity, or phase of motion compared with the surrounding tissue. Incoherent motion was present in endocarditic vegetations, 4th degree aortic plaques, Chiari network, valvular prolapse, intracavitary tumors, and freely oscillating thrombi as well as in normal valve leaflets and papillary muscles. Especially if endocarditic vegetations are present its incoherent motion facilitates to recognize these small structures. The colorcode of this motion pattern demarcates the vegetation reliably from the surrounding tissue (Figure Ib). Within 15 seconds vegetations could be detected in 9 (82%) vs 2 (18%) patients employing only conventional imaging. Using conventional echocardiographic approaches detection of vegetations is frequently hindered by their small size and minor echo intensity (Figure la). In contrast, size and echo intensity do not affect the tissue Doppler signal. Normal papillary muscles and distal portions of the mitral and tricuspid valves were demonstrated to regularly meet the criterion of incoherent tissue motion in the control group. In part, this was also observed with respect to the aortic and pulmonary valves. In valvular tissue incoherent motion was caused by passive floating, whereas papillary muscles show an active inverse motion for short time intervals. Nevertheless, physiologic incoherent motion did not lead to any false differential diagnosis. The phase difference of coherent motion results from damped oscillation. This phenomenon was visualized by tissue Doppler M-mode in 5 thrombi of the left atrial appendage (LAA) (100%) and in 1 ventricular thrombus (50% of all clots). Concordant motion was shown in 3rd degree aortic plaques and postrheumatic and calcified vegetations. These structures were found to be completely embedded or closely attached, so that their passive motion corresponded to the motion of the surrounding regular tissue. Detection and assessment of anomalous structures are based on their motion patterns which can be synchronous or asynchronous in comparison with the surrounding tissue. Another goal of this investigation was to test if the sensitivity of TEE to spontaneous echo contrast can be improved using TDE. In 21 patients presenting with left atrial dilation (left atrial diameter > 44 mm) due to mitral stenosis (n = 8), mitral regurge (n = 5), arterial hypertension (n = 5) and multiple valvular disease (n = 3) fundamental multiplane TEE and transesophageal TDE were performed with standardized gain setting. The control group consisted of 20 randomized individuals with normal left atrial size (left atrial diameter < 40 mm). Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast was defined as low-intensity echoes moving slowly in a circular or spiral shape within the left atrial cavity. Assessment of TDE and fundamental images were performed each by another blinded observer. In the patients group left atrial spontaneous contrast could be detected in 19% using conventional TEE vs 71% employing transesophageal TDE (p < 0.01) (Figures 3 and 4). In the control group no left atrial spontaneous echo contrast was observed. In conclusion, we propose a classification of anomalous tissue motion patterns differentiating incoherent motion, coherent motion with a phase difference, and concordant motion. The presence of incoherent motion expedites detection of endocarditis. The detection of phase differences in motion increases diagnostic certainty in thrombus formation in the LAA. In calcified or completely enveloped structures TDE is not more sensitive than TEE. In addition, TDE improves the detection of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast. It allows the visualization of low-intensity echos moving slowly in a circular or spiral shape even if spontaneous contrast cannot be recognized using conventional imaging. Thus, spontaneous echo contrast is becoming a more sensitive diagnostic criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 505
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Verbesserte Strukturidentifizierung mittels Gewebe-Doppler-EchokardiographieImproved structure identification using tissue doppler echocardiography
    Thomas Bartel
    Silvana Müller
    Stephan Möhlenkamp
    Christian Bruch
    Johannes Schaar
    Raimund Erbel
    Herz, 1998, 23 (8) : 499 - 505
  • [2] Tissue Doppler echocardiography
    Ng, A. C. T.
    Thomas, L.
    Leung, D. Y.
    MINERVA CARDIOANGIOLOGICA, 2010, 58 (03): : 357 - 378
  • [3] Tissue Doppler echocardiography
    Gorcsan, J
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 15 (05) : 323 - 329
  • [4] Tissue Doppler echocardiography
    Erbel, R
    Wallbridge, DR
    Zamorano, J
    Drozdz, J
    Nesser, HJ
    HEART, 1996, 76 (03) : 193 - 196
  • [5] Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis by using Doppler tissue echocardiography
    Hiromoto, M
    Iwamoto, H
    Tanaka, M
    Yamada, N
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2005, 11 (09) : S305 - S305
  • [6] Ventricular Structure and Function in Children With Sickle Cell Disease Using Conventional and Tissue Doppler Echocardiography
    Eddine, Ahmad Charaf
    Alvarez, Ofelia
    Lipshultz, Steven E.
    Kardon, Richard
    Arheart, Kristopher
    Swaminathan, Sethuraman
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 109 (09): : 1358 - 1364
  • [7] Improved detection of inferobasal ischemia during dobutamine echocardiography with Doppler tissue imaging
    Leitman, M
    Sidenko, S
    Wolf, R
    Sucher, E
    Rosenblatt, S
    Peleg, E
    Krakover, R
    Vered, Z
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2003, 16 (05) : 403 - 408
  • [8] Identification of intracardiac thrombus using power Doppler contrast echocardiography
    Bednarz, J
    Spencer, KT
    Weinert, L
    Mor-Avi, V
    Korcarz, CE
    Sugeng, L
    Lang, RM
    CIRCULATION, 1999, 100 (18) : 369 - 369
  • [9] Echocardiography in the identification of responders: The novel role of tissue Doppler imaging and strain imaging
    Carerj, S
    Zito, C
    NEW ADVANCES IN HEART FAILURE AND ATRIAL FIBRILLATION, 2003, : 257 - 261
  • [10] Tissue Doppler echocardiography: Future developments
    Sutherland, GR
    Kukulski, T
    Voight, JU
    D'Hooge, J
    ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 1999, 16 (05): : 509 - 520