Chemical analyses of shale gas and conventional natural gas

被引:12
作者
Demirbas, Ayhan [1 ,2 ]
Cek, Nurettin [3 ]
Acar, Sukru [4 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Fac Engn, POB 80206, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[2] Sila Sci, Dept Renewable Energy, Trabzon, Turkey
[3] Firat Univ, Dept Met & Mat Engn, Fac Engn, Elazig, Turkey
[4] Selcuk Univ, Inst Sci, Konya, Turkey
关键词
chemical analysis; natural gas; sedimentary rock; shale gas; unconventional reservoir; ENERGY; METHANE; FUEL; SULFUR; US;
D O I
10.1080/10916466.2018.1504070
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Shale gas is essentially non-traditional natural gas (NG). Shale gas can be considered an unusual alternative energy source. Shale gas production is a method of obtaining the NG trapped between deep underground rocks. Shale gas production is not economical, except for horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing methods. Advanced analysis of shale gaseous samples can be done using gas chromatography, mass spectrometry and other modern testing methods. The Orsat apparatus includes three absorption pipettes containing chemical solutions that absorb gases. Absorbents are a 33% by weight aqueous solution of potassium hydroxide (KOH) for carbon dioxide (CO2), alkali pyrogallol for oxygen (O-2) and ammoniacal cuprous for carbon monoxide (CO) measurement. Oxygen is absorbed in alkaline pyrogallol or in a chromous solution. Shale gas can be analyzed best gas chromatographically. The capillary column can be separated from all the hydrocarbons and their isomers by alumina, which is used as a stationary phase in the gas chromatographic column, because alumina is highly selective for hydrocarbons. Silica is a specific adsorbent that exhibits greater applicability for hydrocarbons. The chemical contents of shale gas are similar to those of the conventional NG. The processing, transfer and storage and distribution of shale gas are assumed to be similar to the conventional NG.
引用
收藏
页码:1690 / 1695
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Natural catalytic activity in a marine shale for generating natural gas
    Mango, Frank D.
    Jarvie, Daniel M.
    Herriman, Eleanor
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2010, 466 (2124): : 3527 - 3537
  • [32] Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Shale Gas, Natural Gas, Coal, and Petroleum
    Burnham, Andrew
    Han, Jeongwoo
    Clark, Corrie E.
    Wang, Michael
    Dunn, Jennifer B.
    Palou-Rivera, Ignasi
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (02) : 619 - 627
  • [33] The relationship between shale gas production and natural gas prices: An environmental investigation using structural breaks
    Hu, Haiqing
    Wei, Wei
    Chang, Chun-Ping
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 713
  • [34] Tradeoffs in water and carbon footprints of shale gas, natural gas, and coal in China
    Chen, Yizhong
    Li, Jing
    Lu, Hongwei
    Xia, Jun
    FUEL, 2020, 263
  • [35] Longmaxi shale gas geochemistry in Changning and Fuling gas fields, the Sichuan Basin
    Feng, Ziqi
    Huang, Shipeng
    Wu, Wei
    Xie, Chen
    Peng, Weilong
    Cai, Yuwen
    ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2017, 35 (02) : 259 - 278
  • [36] Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Transportation Fuels from Shale Gas-Derived Natural Gas Liquids
    Chen, Qining
    Dunn, Jennifer B.
    Allen, David T.
    26TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING (LCE), 2019, 80 : 346 - 351
  • [37] Analysis of the Energy Balance of Shale Gas Development
    Yaritani, Hiroaki
    Matsushima, Jun
    ENERGIES, 2014, 7 (04): : 2207 - 2227
  • [38] Did shale gas green the US economy?
    Lindequist, David
    Selent, Samuel
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2025, 145
  • [39] Environmental risks of shale gas development in China
    Krupnick, Alan
    Wang, Zhongmin
    Wang, Yushuang
    ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 75 : 117 - 125
  • [40] Environmental risks of shale gas exploitation and solutions for clean shale gas production in China
    Gao, Shikui
    Guan, Quanzhong
    Dong, Dazhong
    Huang, Fang
    FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 15 (02) : 406 - 422