Chemical analyses of shale gas and conventional natural gas

被引:12
作者
Demirbas, Ayhan [1 ,2 ]
Cek, Nurettin [3 ]
Acar, Sukru [4 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Fac Engn, POB 80206, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[2] Sila Sci, Dept Renewable Energy, Trabzon, Turkey
[3] Firat Univ, Dept Met & Mat Engn, Fac Engn, Elazig, Turkey
[4] Selcuk Univ, Inst Sci, Konya, Turkey
关键词
chemical analysis; natural gas; sedimentary rock; shale gas; unconventional reservoir; ENERGY; METHANE; FUEL; SULFUR; US;
D O I
10.1080/10916466.2018.1504070
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Shale gas is essentially non-traditional natural gas (NG). Shale gas can be considered an unusual alternative energy source. Shale gas production is a method of obtaining the NG trapped between deep underground rocks. Shale gas production is not economical, except for horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing methods. Advanced analysis of shale gaseous samples can be done using gas chromatography, mass spectrometry and other modern testing methods. The Orsat apparatus includes three absorption pipettes containing chemical solutions that absorb gases. Absorbents are a 33% by weight aqueous solution of potassium hydroxide (KOH) for carbon dioxide (CO2), alkali pyrogallol for oxygen (O-2) and ammoniacal cuprous for carbon monoxide (CO) measurement. Oxygen is absorbed in alkaline pyrogallol or in a chromous solution. Shale gas can be analyzed best gas chromatographically. The capillary column can be separated from all the hydrocarbons and their isomers by alumina, which is used as a stationary phase in the gas chromatographic column, because alumina is highly selective for hydrocarbons. Silica is a specific adsorbent that exhibits greater applicability for hydrocarbons. The chemical contents of shale gas are similar to those of the conventional NG. The processing, transfer and storage and distribution of shale gas are assumed to be similar to the conventional NG.
引用
收藏
页码:1690 / 1695
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of the shale gas revolution on the US and Japanese natural gas markets
    Wakamatsu, Hiroki
    Aruga, Kentaka
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 : 1002 - 1009
  • [22] Theory, technology and prospects of conventional and unconventional natural gas
    ZOU Caineng
    YANG Zhi
    HE Dongbo
    WEI Yunsheng
    LI Jian
    JIA Ailin
    CHEN Jianjun
    ZHAO Qun
    LI Yilong
    LI Jun
    YANG Shen
    Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45 (04) : 604 - 618
  • [23] Theory, technology and prospects of conventional and unconventional natural gas
    Zou Caineng
    Yang Zhi
    He Dongbo
    Wei Yunsheng
    Li Jian
    Jia Ailin
    Chen Jianjun
    Zhao Qun
    Li Yilong
    Li Jun
    Yang Shen
    PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 45 (04) : 604 - 618
  • [24] New horizon in energy: Shale gas
    Bilgen, Selcuk
    Sarikaya, Ikbal
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 35 : 637 - 645
  • [25] Shale gas production: potential versus actual greenhouse gas emissions
    O'Sullivan, Francis
    Paltsev, Sergey
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [26] Economics and Politics of Shale Gas in Europe
    Chyong, Chi Kong
    Reiner, David M.
    ECONOMICS OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2015, 4 (01) : 69 - 83
  • [27] Explosion characteristics of shale gas in air
    Yang, Xufeng
    Liu, Changlin
    Yu, Minggao
    Han, Shixin
    Yang, Wen
    ENERGY, 2023, 278
  • [28] Theory, technology and prospects of conventional and unconventional natural gas
    Zou C.
    Yang Z.
    He D.
    Wei Y.
    Li J.
    Jia A.
    Chen J.
    Zhao Q.
    Li Y.
    Li J.
    Yang S.
    Shiyou Kantan Yu Kaifa/Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45 (04): : 575 - 587
  • [29] Reducing the greenhouse gas footprint of shale gas
    Wang, Jinsheng
    Ryan, David
    Anthony, Edward J.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (12) : 8196 - 8199
  • [30] Unfinished business in the regulation of shale gas production in the United States
    Centner, Terence J.
    O'Connell, Laura Kathryn
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 476 : 359 - 367