Chemical analyses of shale gas and conventional natural gas

被引:12
作者
Demirbas, Ayhan [1 ,2 ]
Cek, Nurettin [3 ]
Acar, Sukru [4 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Fac Engn, POB 80206, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[2] Sila Sci, Dept Renewable Energy, Trabzon, Turkey
[3] Firat Univ, Dept Met & Mat Engn, Fac Engn, Elazig, Turkey
[4] Selcuk Univ, Inst Sci, Konya, Turkey
关键词
chemical analysis; natural gas; sedimentary rock; shale gas; unconventional reservoir; ENERGY; METHANE; FUEL; SULFUR; US;
D O I
10.1080/10916466.2018.1504070
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Shale gas is essentially non-traditional natural gas (NG). Shale gas can be considered an unusual alternative energy source. Shale gas production is a method of obtaining the NG trapped between deep underground rocks. Shale gas production is not economical, except for horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing methods. Advanced analysis of shale gaseous samples can be done using gas chromatography, mass spectrometry and other modern testing methods. The Orsat apparatus includes three absorption pipettes containing chemical solutions that absorb gases. Absorbents are a 33% by weight aqueous solution of potassium hydroxide (KOH) for carbon dioxide (CO2), alkali pyrogallol for oxygen (O-2) and ammoniacal cuprous for carbon monoxide (CO) measurement. Oxygen is absorbed in alkaline pyrogallol or in a chromous solution. Shale gas can be analyzed best gas chromatographically. The capillary column can be separated from all the hydrocarbons and their isomers by alumina, which is used as a stationary phase in the gas chromatographic column, because alumina is highly selective for hydrocarbons. Silica is a specific adsorbent that exhibits greater applicability for hydrocarbons. The chemical contents of shale gas are similar to those of the conventional NG. The processing, transfer and storage and distribution of shale gas are assumed to be similar to the conventional NG.
引用
收藏
页码:1690 / 1695
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]  
Dong Dazhong, 2016, Natural Gas Industry B, V3, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.ngib.2016.02.002
[12]   Assessment of Methods for Forecasting Shale Gas Supply in China Based on Economic Considerations [J].
Guo, Xiaoqian ;
Yan, Qiang ;
Wang, Anjian .
ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (11)
[13]   Geological factors controlling shale gas enrichment and high production in Fuling shale gas field [J].
Guo Xusheng ;
Hu Dongfeng ;
Li Yuping ;
Wei Zhihong ;
Wei Xiangfeng ;
Liu Zhujiang .
PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 44 (04) :513-523
[14]   Energy Technology Assessment of Shale Gas 'Fracking' - A UK Perspective [J].
Hammond, Geoffrey P. ;
O'Grady, Aine ;
Packham, David E. .
CLEAN, EFFICIENT AND AFFORDABLE ENERGY FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 2015, 75 :2764-2771
[15]   Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations [J].
Howarth, Robert W. ;
Santoro, Renee ;
Ingraffea, Anthony .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2011, 106 (04) :679-690
[16]   The Influence of Shale Gas on US Energy and Environmental Policy [J].
Jacoby, Henry D. ;
O'Sullivan, Francis M. ;
Paltsev, Sergey .
ECONOMICS OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2012, 1 (01) :37-51
[17]   Shale gas: Analysis of its role in the global energy market [J].
Melikoglu, Mehmet .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 37 :460-468
[18]   The Economics of Energy Security [J].
Metcalf, Gilbert E. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 6, 2014, 6 :155-174
[19]  
Mitchell AL, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P4918
[20]   Water Use for Shale-Gas Production in Texas, US [J].
Nicot, Jean-Philippe ;
Scanlon, Bridget R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (06) :3580-3586