Dual commitment to organization and supervisor: A person-centered approach

被引:74
作者
Meyer, John P. [1 ]
Morin, Alexandre J. S. [2 ]
Vandenberghe, Christian [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5C2, Canada
[2] Australian Catholic Univ, Inst Posit Psychol & Educ, Sydney, NSW 2059, Australia
[3] HEC Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Commitment; Organization; Supervisor; Support; Turnover; Latent profiles; OF-FIT INDEXES; NORMATIVE COMMITMENT; EMPLOYEE COMMITMENT; WORK; PROFILES; SUPPORT; ANTECEDENTS; CONTINUANCE; MODELS; FOCI;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvb.2015.02.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A recent trend in commitment research has been to use person-centered analytic strategies to identify homogeneous subgroups with varying configurations of commitment mindsets (affective, normative, continuance) or targets (e.g., organization, supervisor, team). A person-centered approach takes a more holistic perspective than the traditional variable-centered approach and can reflect potentially complex interactions among commitment mindsets and/or targets. We extend application of the person-centered approach to investigate profiles of commitment to two interrelated targets, the organization and supervisor, in two studies (Ns = 481 and 264) involving Belgian university graduates. Using latent profile analyses, we found that a similar 5-profile model fit best in both studies. The mindset pattern for the two targets was similar for some profile groups, but differed for. others. The groups differed on perceived organizational and supervisory support and voluntary turnover largely as expected from commitment and support theory. Implications for future research and management practice are discussed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 72
页数:17
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   THE MEASUREMENT AND ANTECEDENTS OF AFFECTIVE, CONTINUANCE AND NORMATIVE COMMITMENT TO THE ORGANIZATION [J].
ALLEN, NJ ;
MEYER, JP .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 63 (01) :1-18
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, ACAD MANAGE J
[3]  
[Anonymous], STAT APPROACHES MEAS
[4]  
Asparouhov T, 2013, TECHNICAL REPORT
[5]  
Bauer D.J., 2007, Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies, P255
[6]   The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities [J].
Bauer, DJ ;
Curran, PJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2004, 9 (01) :3-29
[7]   Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes [J].
Bauer, DJ ;
Curran, PJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 8 (03) :338-363
[8]   PROFILES OF COMMITMENT - AN EMPIRICAL-TEST [J].
BECKER, TE ;
BILLINGS, RS .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1993, 14 (02) :177-190
[9]  
BECKER TE, 1992, ACAD MANAGE J, V35, P232, DOI 10.5465/256481
[10]   Foci and bases of employee commitment: Implications for job performance [J].
Becker, TE ;
Billings, RS ;
Eveleth, DM ;
Gilbert, NL .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (02) :464-482