Cross-Generational Comparability of Raw and Count-Based Metrics from ActiGraph GT9X and wGT3X-BT Accelerometers during Free-Living in Youth

被引:20
作者
Clevenger, Kimberly A. [1 ]
Pfeiffer, Karin A. [1 ]
Montoye, Alexander H. K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Kinesiol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Alma Coll, Dept Integrat Physiol & Hlth Sci, Alma, MI USA
关键词
Monitor; ENMO; activity; measurement; MAD; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; ACTIVITY MONITORS; CALIBRATION; CHILDREN; WRIST; GT1M; HIP; VALIDATION; WORN; GT3X;
D O I
10.1080/1091367X.2020.1773827
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Free-living comparability of wGT3X-BT and GT9X ActiGraphs has not been verified. Participants (n = 34, 35% females, 7-17 y) wore hip-worn monitors for one week. Vector magnitude (VM; 15-s epoch), Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) and Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) (5-s epoch), and percent of time spent in each activity intensity (using cut-points) were calculated. At the epoch-level, correlations were strong (r = 0.822-0.963), mean absolute percent difference (MAPD) was 41.5 +/- 62.2% (VM), 40.8 +/- 52.7% (MAD), and 110.9 +/- 74.0%, with moderate (ENMO kappa = 0.664-0.789) to strong (VM kappa = 0.915) agreement for activity intensity. When collapsed to the individual level, MAPD was 4.2 +/- 3.4% (VM), 6.8 +/- 3.7% (MAD), and 35.9 +/- 26.1% (ENMO), correlations were moderate (ENMOr= 0.618) to high (MAD and VMr= 0.996), but ENMO, MAD, and time spent in activity intensities using ENMO cut-points were not statistically equivalent (using 2 one-sided tests) between monitors. While time spent in activity intensities was often comparable between models, caution is warranted for epoch-level comparisons.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 204
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Aittasalo M, 2015, BMC SPORTS SCI MED R, V7, DOI 10.1186/s13102-015-0010-0
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, US GUID ACT GT9X LIN
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, IRR VARIOUS COEFFICI
  • [4] [Anonymous], CROSS GENERATION ACC
  • [5] Intensity Thresholds on Raw Acceleration Data: Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) Approaches
    Bakrania, Kishan
    Yates, Thomas
    Rowlands, Alex V.
    Esliger, Dale W.
    Bunnewell, Sarah
    Sanders, James
    Davies, Melanie
    Khunti, Kamlesh
    Edwardson, Charlotte L.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (10):
  • [6] Comparison of older and newer generations of ActiGraph accelerometers with the normal filter and the low frequency extension
    Cain, Kelli L.
    Conway, Terry L.
    Adams, Marc A.
    Husak, Lisa E.
    Sallis, James F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2013, 10
  • [7] Comparison of two Actigraph models for assessing free-living physical activity in Indian adolescents
    Corder, Kirsten
    Brage, Soren
    Ramachandran, Ambady
    Snehalatha, Chamukuttan
    Wareham, Nicholas
    Ekelund, Ulf
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2007, 25 (14) : 1607 - 1611
  • [8] Hip and Wrist Accelerometer Algorithms for Free-Living Behavior Classification
    Ellis, Katherine
    Kerr, Jacqueline
    Godbole, Suneeta
    Staudenmayer, John
    Lanckriet, Gert
    [J]. MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2016, 48 (05) : 933 - 940
  • [9] Wear Compliance and Activity in Children Wearing Wrist- and Hip-Mounted Accelerometers
    Fairclough, Stuart J.
    Noonan, Robert
    Rowlands, Alex V.
    Van Hees, Vincent
    Knowles, Zoe
    Boddy, Lynne M.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2016, 48 (02) : 245 - 253
  • [10] Calibration and validation of accelerometer-based activity monitors: A systematic review of machine-learning approaches
    Farrahi, Vahid
    Niemela, Maisa
    Kangas, Maarit
    Korpelainen, Raija
    Jamsa, Timo
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2019, 68 : 285 - 299