Fecal bacteriotherapy for ulcerative colitis: Patients are ready, are we?

被引:61
作者
Kahn, Stacy A. [1 ]
Gorawara-Bhat, Rita [2 ]
Rubin, David T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Ctr Inflammatory Bowel Dis, Sect Pediat Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, MacLean Ctr Clin Med Eth,Dept Pediat, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Med, Sect Geriatr & Palliat Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Ctr Inflammatory Bowel Dis, MacLean Ctr Clin Med Eth, Gastroenterol Sect, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
ethical issues in IBD; ulcerative colitis; microbiology of IBD; complementary and alternative medicine; focus groups; fecal bacteriotherapy; INFLAMMATORY-BOWEL-DISEASE; HUMAN MICROBIOME PROJECT; ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS; COMPLEMENTARY; FLORA;
D O I
10.1002/ibd.21775
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Fecal bacteriotherapy (FB) has been proposed as a safe and effective alternative treatment for a number of gastrointestinal conditions including ulcerative colitis (UC). We performed a qualitative study to explore the attitudes and concerns of adult patients and parents of children with UC regarding FB as a potential treatment. Methods: We conducted six focus groups for adult patients with UC and parents of children with UC or indeterminate colitis. Participants were asked about their perceptions of and interest in FB as a treatment for UC. Sessions were recorded, transcribed, and reviewed to identify domains, themes, and major concepts. Results: The focus groups included 15 adult patients and seven parents of children with colitis. We identified five major domains pertaining to FB: impressions of treatment, benefits, risks, potential mechanisms, and social concerns. All but one participant expressed interest in FB and several wished it were already available. Participants compared FB to probiotics, felt it was "natural," easier than current therapies, and with donor screening would be safe. Although initial distaste and the "yuck factor" were uniformly mentioned, these concerns were outweighed by perceived benefits. Conclusion: This is the first study to examine important ethical and social issues surrounding FB as a treatment for UC. Given adequate supporting research, donor selection, and screening, adult patients and parents of children with UC will consider FB and are eager for it to become available. These findings have important implications for future microbiome-based treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / 684
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Recurrent Clostridium difficile colitis:: Case series involving 18 patients treated with donor stool administered via a nasogastric tube
    Aas, J
    Gessert, CE
    Bakken, JS
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 36 (05) : 580 - 585
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, FECAL BACTERIOTHERAP
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, FECAL TRANSPLANT I 3
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, HUMAN MICROBIOME PRO
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, HEALED ULCERATIVE CO
  • [6] Patients' Preferences regarding Shared Decision-Making in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results from a Patient-Empowerment Study
    Baars, Judith E.
    Markus, Tineke
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    van der Woude, C. Janneke
    [J]. DIGESTION, 2010, 81 (02) : 113 - 119
  • [7] BENNET JD, 1989, LANCET, V1, P164
  • [8] Bacteriotherapy using fecal flora - Toying with human motions
    Borody, TJ
    Warren, EF
    Leis, SM
    Surace, R
    Ashman, O
    Siarakas, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 38 (06) : 475 - 483
  • [9] Treatment of ulcerative colitis using fecal bacteriotherapy
    Borody, TJ
    Warren, EF
    Leis, S
    Surace, R
    Ashman, O
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 37 (01) : 42 - 47
  • [10] EISEMAN B, 1958, SURGERY, V44, P854