Fair assignment of indivisible objects under ordinal preferences

被引:67
|
作者
Aziz, Haris [1 ]
Gaspers, Serge
Mackenzie, Simon
Walsh, Toby
机构
[1] NICTA, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Fair division; Resource allocation; Envy-freeness; Proportionality; ENVY-FREENESS; PARETO-OPTIMALITY; DIVISION; ALLOCATIONS; EFFICIENCY; ALGORITHM; GOODS;
D O I
10.1016/j.artint.2015.06.002
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We consider the discrete assignment problem in which agents express ordinal preferences over objects and these objects are allocated to the agents in a fair manner. We use the stochastic dominance relation between fractional or randomized allocations to systematically define varying notions of proportionality and envy-freeness for discrete assignments. The computational complexity of checking whether a fair assignment exists is studied for these fairness notions. We also characterize the conditions under which a fair assignment is guaranteed to exist. For a number of fairness concepts, polynomial-time algorithms are presented to check whether a fair assignment exists. Our algorithmic results also extend to the case of unequal entitlements of agents. Our NP-hardness result, which holds for several variants of envy-freeness, answers an open question posed by Bouveret, Endriss, and Lang (ECAI 2010). We also propose fairness concepts that always suggest a non-empty set of assignments with meaningful fairness properties. Among these concepts, optimal proportionality and optimal weak proportionality appear to be desirable fairness concepts. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 92
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods and Chores
    Aziz, Haris
    Caragiannis, Ioannis
    Igarashi, Ayumi
    Walsh, Toby
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, : 53 - 59
  • [32] Fair allocation of indivisible goods with minimum inequality or minimum envy
    Cornilly, Dries
    Puccetti, Giovanni
    Rueschendorf, Ludger
    Vanduffel, Steven
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 297 (02) : 741 - 752
  • [33] Algorithmic Fair Allocation of Indivisible Items: A Survey and New Questions
    Aziz, Haris
    Li, Bo
    Moulin, Herve
    Wu, Xiaowei
    ACM SIGECOM EXCHANGES, 2022, 20 (01) : 24 - 40
  • [34] Ordinal Maximin Guarantees for Group Fair Division
    Manurangsi, Pasin
    Suksompong, Warut
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-THIRD INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, IJCAI 2024, 2024, : 2922 - 2930
  • [35] Efficiency, Sequenceability and Deal-Optimality in Fair Division of Indivisible Goods
    Beynier, Aurelie
    Bouveret, Sylvain
    Lemaitre, Michel
    Maudet, Nicolas
    Rey, Simon
    Shams, Parham
    AAMAS '19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, : 900 - 908
  • [36] Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods: Improvements and Generalizations
    Ghodsi, Mohammad
    Hajiaghayi, MohammadTaghi
    Seddighin, Masoud
    Seddighin, Saeed
    Yami, Hadi
    ACM EC'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 ACM CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS AND COMPUTATION, 2018, : 539 - 556
  • [37] Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods to Asymmetric Agents
    Farhadi, Alireza
    Ghodsi, Mohammad
    Lahaie, Sebastien
    Pennock, David
    Seddighin, Masoud
    Seddighin, Saeed
    Yami, Hadi
    AAMAS'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, 2017, : 1535 - 1537
  • [38] Fair Allocation of Indivisible Items with Conflict Graphs
    Nina Chiarelli
    Matjaž Krnc
    Martin Milanič
    Ulrich Pferschy
    Nevena Pivač
    Joachim Schauer
    Algorithmica, 2023, 85 : 1459 - 1489
  • [39] Characterizations of strategy-proof and fair mechanisms for allocating indivisible goods
    Shinji Ohseto
    Economic Theory, 2006, 29 : 111 - 121
  • [40] Characterizing conflicts in fair division of indivisible goods using a scale of criteria
    Bouveret, Sylvain
    Lemaitre, Michel
    AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2016, 30 (02) : 259 - 290