Development of a Relative Ranking Risk Index for Risk Assessment in the Transportation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Mexico City's Metropolitan Area

被引:7
作者
Gerardo Lopez-Atamoros, Luis [1 ]
Fernandez-Villagomez, Georgina [2 ]
Javier Cruz-Gomez, M. [1 ]
Duran-de-Bazua, Carmen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Chem, Dept Chem Engn, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Engn, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
来源
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | 2011年 / 17卷 / 06期
关键词
relative ranking; liquefied petroleum gas; hazardous materials transportation; emerging economies; risk index; F-AND-EI; DOWS FIRE; GUIDE;
D O I
10.1080/10807039.2011.618383
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The development of a relative ranking methodology created specifically for the assessment of the risk due transportation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Mexico City is reported. Mexico City has a number of conditions that present specific challenges: Large population, varied geography, large consumption of LPG, and all sorts of vehicles, including those for LPG. Given Mexico's status as "emerging economy," it is reasonable to assume that the main causes that promote accidents during transportation of LPG are quite different from those in developed countries. This issue was corroborated through information from official sources and from news media. Due to the lack of official data, a systematic collection of information on the media was performed. A relative ranking methodology was developed based on a systematic study to elucidate the main causes of accidents in Mexico and on the results derived from the integrated database from official data and the media. The weighting that made up the Risk Index for Transportation of LPG is based on the same database. A classification guide was created in order to harmonize criteria in the assessment of the parameters of the proposed risk index.
引用
收藏
页码:1193 / 1209
页数:17
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Risk management of LPG transport activities in Hong Kong [J].
Boult, M .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2000, 71 (1-3) :85-100
[2]  
CCPS (Center for Chemical Process Safety), 2000, GUID CHEM PROC QUANT
[3]  
*CENAPRED, 2010, SUST COM INV ACC CAR
[4]  
CRUZGOMEZ MJ, 2009, CONTENIDO ASIGNATURA
[5]  
DEENERGIA S, 2007, PROSPECTIVA MERCADO, P33
[6]   A framework for risk assessment and decision-making strategies in dangerous good transportation [J].
Fabiano, B ;
Currò, F ;
Palazzi, E ;
Pastorino, R .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2002, 93 (01) :1-15
[7]  
GONZALEZMORAN T, 2002, 28 C INT ING SAN AMB
[8]   Calculation of Fire and Explosion Index (F&EI) value for the Dow Guide taking credit for the loss control measures [J].
Gupta, JP ;
Khemani, G ;
Marman, MS .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2003, 16 (04) :235-241
[9]   Application of DOW's fire and explosion index hazard classification guide to process plants in the developing countries [J].
Gupta, JP .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 1997, 10 (01) :7-15
[10]   The influence of information delivery on risk ranking by lay people [J].
Gutierrez, Virna Vaneza ;
Cifuentes, Luis Abdon ;
Bronfman, Nicolas C. .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2006, 9 (06) :641-655