Ultrasound assessment of intrauterine growth restriction: relationship to neonatal body composition

被引:15
作者
Law, Tameeka L. [1 ]
Korte, Jeffrey E. [2 ]
Katikaneni, Lakshmi D. [3 ]
Wagner, Carol L. [3 ]
Ebeling, Myla D. [3 ]
Newman, Roger B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Med Univ S Carolina, Div Biostat & Epidemiol, Dept Med, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[3] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Pediat, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
air displacement plethysmography; body fat percent; intrauterine growth restriction; prenatal ultrasound assessment; FETAL-GROWTH; ABDOMINAL CIRCUMFERENCE; INFANTS; WEIGHT; PREDICTION; VALIDATION; DIAGNOSIS; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.027
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare prenatal ultrasound parameters for intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) with newborn percent body fat (% BF). STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective study of 87 pregnancies followed with ultrasound. Subjects were categorized into 3 groups: estimated fetal weight (EFW) less than the 10th percentile, abdominal circumference (AC) less than the fifth percentile, and normal biometry. Neonatal % BF by air displacement plethysmography was compared between each group using multivariable analyses. RESULTS: The % BF in the EFW less than the 10th percentile group (5.1 +/- 2.9%) was significantly lower than either AC less than the fifth percentile (9.5 +/- 3.3%) or normal groups (11.6 +/- 5.6%). EFW less than the 10th percentile best predicted % BF by regression model. Neonatal morbidity was not significantly higher in the EFW less than the 10th percentile group. CONCLUSION: Newborn % BF was significantly lower in infants with EFW less than the 10th percentile compared with AC less than the fifth percentile, an intermediate finding. An AC less than the fifth percentile on ultrasound does not reflect the same severity of IUGR as EFW less than the 10th percentile.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Reference ranges for serial measurements of umbilical artery Doppler indices in the second half of pregnancy [J].
Acharya, G ;
Wilsgaard, T ;
Berntsen, GKR ;
Maltau, JM ;
Kiserud, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (03) :937-944
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM J OBSTET GYNECOL
[3]  
BROWN HL, 1987, OBSTET GYNECOL, V69, P631
[4]   Maternal factors that determine neonatal size and body fat. [J].
Catalano P.M. ;
Kirwan J.P. .
Current Diabetes Reports, 2001, 1 (1) :71-77
[5]   FACTORS AFFECTING FETAL GROWTH AND BODY-COMPOSITION [J].
CATALANO, PM ;
DRAGO, NM ;
AMINI, SB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 172 (05) :1459-1463
[6]  
CATALANO PM, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V79, P46
[7]  
CHANG TC, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V80, P1030
[8]  
CHANG TC, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P230
[9]   Suspicion of intrauterine growth restriction: Use of abdominal circumference alone or estimated fetal weight below 10% [J].
Chauhan, Suneet P. ;
Cole, Jill ;
Sanderson, Maureen ;
Magann, Everett F. ;
Scardo, James A. .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2006, 19 (09) :557-562
[10]  
Cox SM, 2001, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V72, P85