A Simple, Coherent Framework for Partitioning Uncertainty in Climate Predictions

被引:214
作者
Yip, Stan [1 ]
Ferro, Christopher A. T. [1 ]
Stephenson, David B. [1 ]
Hawkins, Ed [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Natl Ctr Atmospher Sci, Exeter EX4 4QF, Devon, England
[2] Univ Reading, Dept Meteorol, Natl Ctr Atmospher Sci, Reading, Berks, England
关键词
POTENTIAL PREDICTABILITY; INTERANNUAL VARIABILITY; ENSEMBLE;
D O I
10.1175/2011JCLI4085.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
A simple and coherent framework for partitioning uncertainty in multimodel climate ensembles is presented. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used to decompose a measure of total variation additively into scenario uncertainty, model uncertainty, and internal variability. This approach requires fewer assumptions than existing methods and can be easily used to quantify uncertainty related to model-scenario interaction-the contribution to model uncertainty arising from the variation across scenarios of model deviations from the ensemble mean. Uncertainty in global mean surface air temperature is quantified as a function of lead time for a subset of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 3 ensemble and results largely agree with those published by other authors: scenario uncertainty dominates beyond 2050 and internal variability remains approximately constant over the twenty-first century. Both elements of model uncertainty, due to scenario-independent and scenario-dependent deviations from the ensemble mean, are found to increase with time. Estimates of model deviations that arise as by-products of the framework reveal significant differences between models that could lead to a deeper understanding of the sources of uncertainty in multimodel ensembles. For example, three models show a diverging pattern over the twenty-first century, while another model exhibits an unusually large variation among its scenario-dependent deviations.
引用
收藏
页码:4634 / 4643
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Changes in Interannual Variability and Decadal Potential Predictability under Global Warming [J].
Boer, G. J. .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2009, 22 (11) :3098-3109
[2]   The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of stratospheric ozone over the 21st century [J].
Charlton-Perez, A. J. ;
Hawkins, E. ;
Eyring, V. ;
Cionni, I. ;
Bodeker, G. E. ;
Kinnison, D. E. ;
Akiyoshi, H. ;
Frith, S. M. ;
Garcia, R. ;
Gettelman, A. ;
Lamarque, J. F. ;
Nakamura, T. ;
Pawson, S. ;
Yamashita, Y. ;
Bekki, S. ;
Braesicke, P. ;
Chipperfield, M. P. ;
Dhomse, S. ;
Marchand, M. ;
Mancini, E. ;
Morgenstern, O. ;
Pitari, G. ;
Plummer, D. ;
Pyle, J. A. ;
Rozanov, E. ;
Scinocca, J. ;
Shibata, K. ;
Shepherd, T. G. ;
Tian, W. ;
Waugh, D. W. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2010, 10 (19) :9473-9486
[3]   Climate change - A changing climate for prediction [J].
Cox, Peter ;
Stephenson, David .
SCIENCE, 2007, 317 (5835) :207-208
[4]   INTERPRETATION OF INTERACTION: A REVIEW [J].
De Gonzalez, Amy Berrington ;
Cox, D. R. .
ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2007, 1 (02) :371-385
[5]   THE ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE [J].
EISENHART, C .
BIOMETRICS, 1947, 3 (01) :1-21
[6]   Analysis of variance - Why it is more important than ever [J].
Gelman, A .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2005, 33 (01) :1-31
[7]   The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change [J].
Hawkins, Ed ;
Sutton, Rowan .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2011, 37 (1-2) :407-418
[8]   THE POTENTIAL TO NARROW UNCERTAINTY IN REGIONAL CLIMATE PREDICTIONS [J].
Hawkins, Ed ;
Sutton, Rowan .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 90 (08) :1095-+
[9]   Development of probability distributions for regional climate change from uncertain global mean warming and an uncertain scaling relationship [J].
Hingray, B. ;
Mezghani, A. ;
Buishand, T. A. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2007, 11 (03) :1097-1114
[10]   Twentieth century climate model response and climate sensitivity [J].
Kiehl, Jeffrey T. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2007, 34 (22)