Safety and efficacy of etomidate and propofol anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy: A double-blind randomized clinical study

被引:40
作者
Meng, Qing-Tao [1 ]
Cao, Chen [2 ]
Liu, Hui-Min [1 ]
Xia, Zhong-Yuan [1 ]
Li, Wei [1 ]
Tang, Ling-Hua [1 ]
Chen, Rong [1 ]
Jiang, Meng [1 ]
Wu, Yang [1 ]
Leng, Yan [1 ]
Lee, Chris C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Renmin Hosp, 238 Jiefang Rd, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Third Hosp Wuhan, Dept Med, Wuhan 430060, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
anesthesia; gastroscopy; elderly patients; etomidate; propofol; UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; ADRENOCORTICAL FUNCTION; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SEDATION; COMPLICATIONS; RISK;
D O I
10.3892/etm.2016.3475
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study is to compare the safety, efficacy and cost effectiveness of anesthetic regimens by compound, using etomidate and propofol in elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy. A total of 200 volunteers (65-79 years of age) scheduled for gastroscopy under anesthesia were randomly divided into the following groups: P, propofol (1.5-2.0 mg/kg); E, etomidate (0.15-0.2 mg/kg); P+E, propofol (0.75-1 mg/kg) followed by etomidate (0.075-0.1 mg/kg); and E+P, etomidate (0.075-0.01 mg/kg) followed by propofol (0.75-1 mg/kg). Vital signs and bispectral index were monitored at different time points. Complications, induction and examination time, anesthesia duration, and recovery and discharge time were recorded. At the end of the procedure, the satisfaction of patients, endoscopists and the anesthetist were evaluated. The recovery (6.1 +/- 1.2 h) and discharge times (24.8 +/- 2.8 h) in group E were significantly longer compared with groups P, P+E and E+P (P<0.05). The occurrence of injection pain in group P+E was significantly higher compared with the other three groups (P<0.05). In addition, the incidence of myoclonus and post-operative nausea and vomiting were significantly higher in group P+E compared with the other three groups (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference among the four groups with regards to the patients' immediate, post-procedure satisfaction (P>0.05). Furthermore, there was no difference in the satisfaction of anesthesia, as evaluated by the anesthetist and endoscopist, among the four groups (P>0.05). The present study demonstrates that anesthesia for gastroscopy in elderly patients can be safely and effectively accomplished using a drug regimen that combines propofol with etomidate. The combined use of propofol and etomidate has unique characteristics which improve hemodynamic stability, cause minimal respiratory depression and less side effects, provide rapid return to full activity and result in high levels of satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:1515 / 1524
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Absalom A, 1999, ANAESTHESIA, V54, P861
[2]   A prospective assessment of sedation-related adverse events and patient and endoscopist satisfaction in ERCP with anesthesiologist-administered sedation [J].
Berzin, Tyler M. ;
Sanaka, Sirish ;
Barnett, Sheila R. ;
Sundar, Eswar ;
Sepe, Paul S. ;
Jakubowski, Moshe ;
Pleskow, Douglas K. ;
Chuttani, Ram ;
Sawhney, Mandeep S. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 73 (04) :710-717
[3]   Distribution trends of gastric polyps: An endoscopy database analysis of 24 121 northern Chinese patients [J].
Cao, Hailong ;
Wang, Bangmao ;
Zhang, Zhihua ;
Zhang, Hui ;
Qu, Rui .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 (07) :1175-1180
[4]   Risk of sedation for diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy in obstructive sleep apnea patients [J].
Cha, Jae Myung ;
Jeun, Jung Won ;
Pack, Kwan Mi ;
Lee, Joung Il ;
Joo, Kwang Ro ;
Shin, Hyun Phil ;
Shin, Won-Chul .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (29) :4745-4751
[5]   AGA institute review of endoscopic sedation [J].
Cohen, Lawrence B. ;
Delegge, Mark H. ;
Aisenberg, James ;
Brill, Joel V. ;
Inadomi, John M. ;
Kochman, Michael L. ;
Piorkowski, Joseph D., Jr. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 133 (02) :675-701
[6]   Target-controlled infusion during monitored anesthesia care in patients undergoing EUS: Propofol alone versus midazolam plus propofol A prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial [J].
Fanti, L. ;
Agostoni, M. ;
Arcidiacono, P. G. ;
Albertin, A. ;
Strini, G. ;
Carrara, S. ;
Guslandi, M. ;
Torri, G. ;
Testoni, P. A. .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2007, 39 (01) :81-86
[7]   Cardiopulmonary complications of ERCP in older patients [J].
Fisher, L ;
Fisher, A ;
Thomson, A .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (07) :948-955
[8]   Cardiovascular complications after GI endoscopy: occurrence and risks in a large hospital system [J].
Gangi, S ;
Saidi, F ;
Patel, K ;
Johnstone, B ;
Jaeger, J ;
Shine, D .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (05) :679-685
[9]   Does atropine reduce the risk of propofol-induced cardiovascular depression? [J].
Kitagawa, Norihito ;
Katoku, Mitsuhiro ;
Kasahara, Takanori ;
Tsuruta, Toshiyuki ;
Oda, Mayuko ;
Totoki, Tadahide .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 103 (06) :1606-1608
[10]   Pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism in the elderly [J].
Klotz, Ulrich .
DRUG METABOLISM REVIEWS, 2009, 41 (02) :67-76