Ambulatory blood pressure profile and blood pressure variability in peritoneal dialysis compared with hemodialysis and chronic kidney disease patients

被引:26
作者
Alexandrou, Maria Eleni [1 ,2 ]
Loutradis, Charalampos [1 ]
Schoina, Maria [1 ]
Tzanis, Georgios [1 ]
Dimitriadis, Chrysostomos [1 ]
Sachpekidis, Vasileios [3 ]
Papadopoulou, Dorothea [2 ]
Gkaliagkousi, Eugenia [4 ]
Papagianni, Aikaterini [1 ]
Parati, Gianfranco [5 ,6 ]
Sarafidis, Pantelis [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Hippokrat Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Papageorgiou Gen Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Thessaloniki, Greece
[3] Papageorgiou Gen Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Thessaloniki, Greece
[4] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Papageorgiou Gen Hosp, Dept Internal Med 3, Thessaloniki, Greece
[5] San Luca Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Neural & Metab Sci, Ist Auxol Italiano, Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, Milan, Italy
关键词
peritoneal dialysis; hemodialysis; chronic kidney disease; ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; blood pressure variability; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; HYPERTENSION; ASSOCIATION; MORTALITY; OFFICE; GAIN;
D O I
10.1038/s41440-020-0442-0
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Hypertension in end-stage renal disease patients is highly prevalent and poorly controlled. Data on the ambulatory blood pressure (BP) profile and BP variability (BPV) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are absent. This study examined the BP profile and BPV of patients undergoing PD in comparison with hemodialysis (HD) and predialysis chronic kidney disease CKD patients. Thirty-eight PD patients were matched for age, sex, and dialysis vintage with 76 HD patients and for age and sex with 38 patients with CKD stage 2-4. Patients under PD or HD underwent 48-h and CKD patients 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring. BP levels and BPV indices were compared for the 48-h, first and second 24 h, daytime and nighttime periods. Two-way mixed ANOVA for repeated measurements was used to evaluate the effects of dialysis modality and time on ambulatory BP in PD and HD. During all periods studied, SBP and DBP were numerically higher but not significantly different in PD than in HD patients. Systolic BP was significantly higher in PD or HD than in predialysis CKD (PD: 138.38 +/- 20.97 mmHg; HD: 133.75 +/- 15.5 mmHg; CKD: 125.52 +/- 13.4 mmHg, p = 0.003), a difference evident also during daytime and nighttime periods. Repeated-measurements ANOVA showed no effect of dialysis modality on ambulatory BP during any period studied. All BPV indices studied were similar between PD and HD patients, in whom they were higher than in CKD individuals (first 24-h systolic-ARV: PD: 11.86 +/- 3.19 mmHg; HD: 11.23 +/- 3.45 mmHg; CKD: 9.81 +/- 2.49 mmHg, p = 0.016). Average BP levels and BPV indices are similar between PD and HD patients, in whom they are higher than in their CKD counterparts. The dialysis modality has no effect on the ambulatory BP profile. These results suggest that PD is no better than HD with regard to overall BP control or BP fluctuations over time.
引用
收藏
页码:903 / 913
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Assessment and Management of Hypertension in Patients on Dialysis [J].
Agarwal, Rajiv ;
Flynn, Joseph ;
Pogue, Velvie ;
Rahman, Mahboob ;
Reisin, Efrain ;
Weir, Matthew R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2014, 25 (08) :1630-1646
[2]   Characteristics of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability in hemodialysis patients [J].
Amari, Yoshifumi ;
Morimoto, Satoshi ;
Iida, Takeshi ;
Yurugi, Takatomi ;
Oyama, Yasuo ;
Aoyama, Naoki ;
Nakajima, Fumitaka ;
Shimizu, Satoru ;
Ichihara, Atsuhiro .
HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2019, 42 (07) :1036-1048
[3]   A Comparative Study of Short-Term Blood Pressure Variability in Hemodialysis Patients with and without Intradialytic Hypertension [J].
Bikos, Athanasios ;
Angeloudi, Elena ;
Memmos, Evangelos ;
Loutradis, Charalampos ;
Karpetas, Antonios ;
Ginikopoulou, Evi ;
Panagoutsos, Stylianos ;
Pasadakis, Ploumis ;
Liakopoulos, Vassilios ;
Papagianni, Aikaterini ;
Sarafidis, Pantelis .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 48 (04) :295-305
[4]   A new method for assessing 24-h blood pressure variability after excluding the contribution of nocturnal blood pressure fall [J].
Bilo, Grzegorz ;
Giglio, Alessia ;
Styczkiewicz, Katarzyna ;
Caldara, Gianluca ;
Maronati, Alberto ;
Kawecka-Jaszcz, Kalina ;
Mancia, Giuseppe ;
Parati, Gianfranco .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2007, 25 (10) :2058-2066
[5]   Association between long-term blood pressure variability and mortality among incident hemodialysis patients [J].
Brunelli, Steven M. ;
Thadhani, Ravi I. ;
Lynch, Katherine E. ;
Ankers, Elizabeth D. ;
Joffe, Marshall M. ;
Boston, Raymond ;
Chang, Yuchaio ;
Feldman, Harold I. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2008, 52 (04) :716-726
[6]   Prevalence of hypertension in patients on peritoneal dialysis: results of an Italian multicentre study [J].
Cocchi, R ;
Esposti, ED ;
Fabbri, A ;
Lucatello, A ;
Sturani, A ;
Quarello, F ;
Boero, R ;
Bruno, M ;
Dadone, C ;
Favazza, A ;
Scanziani, R ;
Tommasi, A ;
Giangrande, A .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 14 (06) :1536-1540
[7]  
de la Sierra Alejandro, 2020, Hypertension, pHYPERTENSIONAHA11914508, DOI 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14508
[8]   Association of Intradialytic Blood Pressure Variability With Increased All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients Treated With Long-term Hemodialysis [J].
Flythe, Jennifer E. ;
Inrig, Jula K. ;
Shafi, Tariq ;
Chang, Tara I. ;
Cape, Kathryn ;
Dinesh, Kumar ;
Kunaparaju, Shrikanth ;
Brunelli, Steven M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2013, 61 (06) :966-974
[9]   Pro: Should we move to more frequent haemodialysis schedules? [J].
Georgianos, Panagiotis I. ;
Sarafidis, Pantelis A. .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 30 (01) :18-22
[10]   Differences Between Office and 24-Hour Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Patients With CKD: A 5,693-Patient Cross-sectional Analysis From Spain [J].
Gorostidi, Manuel ;
Sarafidis, Pantelis A. ;
de la Sierra, Alejandro ;
Segura, Julian ;
de la Cruz, Juan J. ;
Banegas, Jose R. ;
Ruilope, Luis M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2013, 62 (02) :285-294