Quality assurance: using the exposure index and the deviation index to monitor radiation exposure for portable chest radiographs in neonates

被引:27
作者
Cohen, Mervyn D. [1 ,2 ]
Cooper, Matt L. [2 ]
Piersall, Kelly [2 ]
Apgar, Bruce K. [3 ]
机构
[1] James Whitcomb Riley Hosp Children, Dept Radiol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Riley Childrens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Agfa HealthCare Corp, Greenville, SC USA
关键词
Exposure index; Deviation index; Radiation safety; Neonate; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1007/s00247-010-1951-9
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Many methods are used to track patient exposure during acquisition of plain film radiographs. A uniform international standard would aid this process. To evaluate and describe a new, simple quality-assurance method for monitoring patient exposure. This method uses the "exposure index" and the "deviation index," recently developed by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). The deviation index measures variation from an ideal target exposure index value. Our objective was to determine whether the exposure index and the deviation index can be used to monitor and control exposure drift over time. Our Agfa workstation automatically keeps a record of the exposure index for every patient. The exposure index and deviation index were calculated on 1,884 consecutive neonatal chest images. Exposure of a neonatal chest phantom was performed as a control. Acquisition of the exposure index and calculation of the deviation index was easily achieved. The weekly mean exposure index of the phantom and the patients was stable and showed < 10% change during the study, indicating no exposure drift during the study period. The exposure index is an excellent tool to monitor the consistency of patient exposures. It does not indicate the exposure value used, but is an index to track compliance with a pre-determined target exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 601
页数:10
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Radiosensitivity of children: potential for overexposure in CR and DR and magnitude of doses in ordinary radiographic examinations [J].
Don, S .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2004, 34 (Suppl 3) :S167-S172
[2]   The Image Gently campaign:: Working together to change practice [J].
Goske, Marilyn J. ;
Applegate, Kimberly E. ;
Boylan, Jennifer ;
Butler, Priscilla F. ;
Callahan, Michael J. ;
Coley, Brian D. ;
Farley, Shawn ;
Frush, Donald P. ;
Hernanz-Schulman, Marta ;
Jaramillo, Diego ;
Johnson, Neil D. ;
Kaste, Sue C. ;
Morrison, Greg ;
Strauss, Keith J. ;
Tuggle, Nora .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (02) :273-274
[3]  
*IEC, 2008, 624941200808 IEC
[4]  
International Commission on Radiological Protection, 2004, Ann ICRP, V34, P1
[5]   Management of pediatric radiation dose using Agfa computed radiography [J].
Schaetzing, R .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2004, 34 (Suppl 3) :S207-S214
[6]   An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Task Group 116 (Executive Summary) [J].
Shepard, S. Jeff ;
Wang, Jihong ;
Flynn, Michael ;
Gingold, Eric ;
Goldman, Lee ;
Krugh, Kerry ;
Leong, David L. ;
Mah, Eugene ;
Ogden, Kent ;
Peck, Donald ;
Samei, Ehsan ;
Willis, Charles E. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (07) :2898-2914
[7]   Digital radiography: The balance between image quality and required radiation dose [J].
Uffmann, Martin ;
Schaefer-Prokop, Cornelia .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 72 (02) :202-208
[8]   Transition from screen-film to digital radiography:: Evolution of patient radiation doses at projection radiography [J].
Vano, Eliseo ;
Fernandez, Jose Miguel ;
Ten, Jose Ignacio ;
Prieto, Carlos ;
Gonzalez, Luciano ;
Rodriguez, Ricardo ;
de Las Heras, Hugo .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 243 (02) :461-466
[9]  
WILLIS CE, 1995, SPIE, V2432, P12