Digital Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Literature Review of the Role of Individual vs. Social Settings for Measuring Learning Outcomes

被引:18
作者
Kuemmel, Elke [1 ]
Moskaliuk, Johannes [1 ]
Cress, Ulrike [1 ,2 ]
Kimmerle, Joachim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Wissensmedien, Knowledge Construct Lab, Schleichstr 6, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Eberhard Karls Univ Tubingen, Dept Psychol, Schleichstr 4, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
来源
EDUCATION SCIENCES | 2020年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
digital learning environments; higher education; evaluation methodologies; learning outcomes; media in education; collaborative learning; COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY; UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS; TECHNOLOGY USE; KNOWLEDGE; ENGAGEMENT; MODEL; METAANALYSIS; INFORMATION; COMPUTER; TEACHERS;
D O I
10.3390/educsci10030078
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research on digital learning environments has traditionally applied either an individual perspective or a social perspective to learning. Based on a literature review, we examined to what extent individual or social perspectives determined the learning outcome variables that researchers have used as measurements in existing studies. We analyzed prototypical approaches to operationalize learning settings (individual vs. social) published in peer-reviewed journals and identified their relation to several measures of learning outcomes. We rated n = 356 articles and included n = 246 articles in the final analysis. A total of 159 studies (64.6%) used an individual learning setting, while 87 studies (35.4%) used a social learning setting. As learning outcome measures, we observed self-reports, observable behavior, learning skills, elaboration, personal initiatives, digital activity, and social interactions. The two types of learning settings differed regarding the measurement of elaboration and social interactions. We discuss of the implications of our findings for future research and conclude that researchers should investigate further measures of learning outcomes in digital learning settings.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 136 条
[31]  
Barsalou LW, 1999, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V22, P577, DOI 10.1017/S0140525X99532147
[32]   A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied [J].
Bernard, Robert M. ;
Borokhovski, Eugene ;
Schmid, Richard F. ;
Tamim, Rana M. ;
Abrami, Philip C. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 26 (01) :87-122
[33]   The impact of physicians' communication styles on evaluation of physicians and information processing: A randomized study with simulated video consultations on contraception with an intrauterine device [J].
Bientzle, Martina ;
Fissler, Tim ;
Cress, Ulrike ;
Kimmerle, Joachim .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (05) :845-851
[34]   Impact of Scientific Versus Emotional Wording of Patient Questions on Doctor-Patient Communication in an Internet Forum: A Randomized Controlled Experiment with Medical Students [J].
Bientzle, Martina ;
Griewatz, Jan ;
Kimmerle, Joachim ;
Kueppers, Julia ;
Cress, Ulrike ;
Lammerding-Koeppel, Maria .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (11)
[35]  
Biggs J.B., 2014, EVALUATING QUALITY L
[36]  
Binkley M, 2012, ASSESSMENT AND TEACHING OF 21ST CENTURY SKILLS, P17, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
[37]  
Boekaerts M., 1999, International Journal of Educational Research, V31, P445, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2
[38]   Using the SOLO taxonomy to analyze competence progression of university science curricula [J].
Brabrand, Claus ;
Dahl, Bettina .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 58 (04) :531-549
[39]  
Brown J.S., 1989, Educ. Res, V18, P32, DOI [DOI 10.2307/1176008, 10.2307/1176008]
[40]   Selective reading of large online forum discussions: The impact of rating visualizations on navigation and learning [J].
Buder, Juergen ;
Schwind, Christina ;
Rudat, Anja ;
Bodemer, Daniel .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 44 :191-201