Barriers to patient involvement in health service planning and evaluation: An exploratory study

被引:67
作者
Gagliardi, Anna R. [1 ]
Lemieux-Charles, Louise [2 ]
Brown, Adalsteinn D. [2 ]
Sullivan, Terrence [2 ]
Goel, Vivek [2 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
patient participation; decision-making; health care evaluation; quality indicators;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Patient involvement in health service planning and evaluation is considered important yet not widely practiced. This study explored stakeholder beliefs about patient participation in performance indicator selection to better understand hypothesized barriers. Methods: Interviews with 30 cancer patients and health professionals from two teaching hospitals were analyzed qualitatively. Results: All groups believed patients, not members of the public, should be involved in the selection of indicators. Ongoing, interactive methods such as committee involvement, rather than single, passive efforts such as surveys were preferred. Health professionals recommended patients assume a consultative, rather than decision-making role. Older patients agreed with this. Conclusion: Variable patient interest, health professional attitudes, and a lack of insight on appropriate methods may be limiting patient involvement in this, and other service planning and evaluation activities. More research is required to validate expressed views among the populations these stakeholders represent, and to establish effective methods for engaging patients. Practice implications: Efforts to encourage a change in health professional attitude may be required, along with dedicated organizational resources. coordinators and training. Methods to engage patients should involve deliberation, which can be achieved through modified Delphi panel or participatory research approaches. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 241
页数:8
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting [J].
Abelson, J ;
Eyles, J ;
McLeod, CB ;
Collins, P ;
McMullan, C ;
Forest, PG .
HEALTH POLICY, 2003, 66 (01) :95-106
[2]   Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes [J].
Abelson, J ;
Forest, PG ;
Eyles, J ;
Smith, P ;
Martin, E ;
Gauvin, FP .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 57 (02) :239-251
[3]  
Abelson Julia, 2004, J Health Serv Res Policy, V9, P205, DOI 10.1258/1355819042250203
[4]   From individual to group: use of narratives in a participatory research process [J].
Aranda, S ;
Street, A .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2001, 33 (06) :791-797
[5]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[6]  
Auerbach C. F., 2003, QUALITATIVE DATA INT
[7]  
Beaver Kinta, 1999, Health Expect, V2, P266, DOI 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00066.x
[8]  
Caron-Flinterman JF, 2005, HEALTH EXPECT, V8, P253
[9]   Cultural influences on the physician-patient encounter: The case of shared treatment decision-making [J].
Charles, Cathy ;
Gafni, Amiram ;
Whelan, Tim ;
O'Brien, Mary Ann .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2006, 63 (03) :262-267
[10]   Health care quality - Incorporating consumer perspectives [J].
Cleary, PD ;
EdgmanLevitan, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (19) :1608-1612