Telephone versus in-person interviews for alcohol use: results of the 2000 National Alcohol Survey

被引:92
作者
Midanik, LT
Greenfield, TK
机构
[1] Inst Publ Hlth, Alcohol Res Grp, Berkeley, CA 94709 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Social Welf, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
alcohol epidemiology; telephone; in-person; methodology; data collection mode; interviews;
D O I
10.1016/S0376-8716(03)00204-7
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
This study assesses differences in reports of alcohol use and alcohol-related harms using telephone and in-person interviews in a subsample of the 2000 National Alcohol Survey (NAS) (N = 411). Respondents were given a brief telephone interview which assessed their alcohol use and alcohol-related harms in the last 12 months followed by an in-person interview 2 months later that obtained the same data. Approximately 90% (n = 371) reported their drinking status consistently between interviews (277 current drinkers; 94 non-drinkers). Approximately 7% (n = 29) became current drinkers and 2.7% (n = 11) became non-drinkers at the second interview. The majority of respondents who changed their drinking status in either direction were low level drinkers. Using logistic regression modeling, no significant associations were found between demographic factors and consistency of reported drinking status. Further, there were no differences by mode for the two alcohol consumption measures (mean daily volume and mean number of days drank five or more drinks in the last 12 months) and alcohol-related harms in the last 12 months for current drinkers (n = 277). In conjunction with other mode studies, these findings support the use of telephone interviewing in large national surveys to obtain alcohol use and alcohol-related harms data. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 214
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ALCOHOL HLTH MONOGRA
[2]   INTERVIEW MODE EFFECTS IN SURVEYS OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL-USE - A FIELD EXPERIMENT [J].
AQUILINO, WS .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1994, 58 (02) :210-240
[3]  
AQUILINO WS, 1992, INT J ADDICT, V27, P71
[4]   Substance use estimates from RDD and area probability samples - Impact of differential screening methods and unit nonresponse [J].
Aquilino, WS ;
Wright, DL .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1996, 60 (04) :563-573
[5]  
Biemer Paul P., 2001, J. Off. Stat., V17, P295
[6]  
Caetano R, 1998, ALCOHOL HEALTH RES W, V22, P233
[7]  
Cannel C, 1987, VITAL HLTH STAT, VS2, P106
[8]  
CANNELL C, 1981, RES REDUCTION RESPON
[9]  
COHEN J, 1987, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[10]   Towards agreement on ways to measure and report drinking patterns and alcohol-related problems in adult general population surveys: the Skarpo Conference overview [J].
Dawson, DA ;
Room, R .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2000, 12 (1-2) :1-21