Tutor training, evaluation criteria and teaching environment influence students' ratings of tutor feedback in problem-based learning

被引:22
作者
Baroffio, Anne
Nendaz, Mathieu R.
Perrier, Arnaud
Vu, Nu V.
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Unit Dev & Res Med Educ, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
[2] Univ Geneva, Dept Internal Med, Fac Med, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
evaluation questionnaire; faculty-development workshop; giving feedback; problem-based-learning process; teaching unit; tutor performance;
D O I
10.1007/s10459-006-9008-4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Aim: In a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum, tutor's feedback skills are important. However, evaluation studies often show that students rate many tutors as ineffective in providing feedback. We explored whether this is related: (a) to tutors' skills, and hence a teaching intervention might improve their performance; (b) to the formulation of the evaluation item, hence a more specific wording might help students better recognize a feedback when received; (c) to PBL teaching environment, and hence the tutors' teaching unit might influence students' ratings. Methods: Students rated 126 tutors of 13 one-month teaching units over three consecutive years on their ability of providing feedback. We assessed how (a) a teaching intervention given between years 1 and 2, (b) a rewording of the evaluation item which took place in year 3, and (c) the tutors' teaching unit, influenced students' ratings. Results: The ratings of tutors considered as effective by students at year 1 improved after the teaching intervention, while those of unsatisfactory tutors did not progress. However the ratings of the latter increased after reformulation of the evaluation item. This increase varied across teaching units. Discussion: Students' ratings of tutors' ability to give feedback seem to vary in function of the tutors' training, of the formulation of the evaluation item, and of the tutors' teaching environment. These variables should be considered for setting up effective strategies in faculty development.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 439
页数:13
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
BAROFFIO A, 2006, IN PRESS MED TEACHER, V28
[2]  
Barondeau DP, 1999, J INORG BIOCHEM, V74, P75
[3]  
Barratt MS, 2004, AMBUL PEDIATR, V4, P117, DOI 10.1367/1539-4409(2004)004<0117:EOATSP>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   Coaching medical students in receiving effective feedback [J].
Bing-You, RG ;
Bertsch, T ;
Thompson, JA .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 1998, 10 (04) :228-231
[6]  
BLAIR GM, 1968, ED PSYCHOL
[7]   Feedback and reflection: Teaching methods for clinical settings [J].
Branch, WT ;
Paranjape, A .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2002, 77 (12) :1185-1188
[8]   A RATING-SCALE FOR TUTOR EVALUATION IN A PROBLEM-BASED CURRICULUM - VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY [J].
DOLMANS, DHJM ;
WOLFHAGEN, IHAP ;
SCHMIDT, HG ;
VANDERVLEUTEN, CPM .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1994, 28 (06) :550-558
[9]   FEEDBACK IN CLINICAL MEDICAL-EDUCATION [J].
ENDE, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1983, 250 (06) :777-781
[10]   How can I know what I don't know? Poor self assessment in a well-defined domain [J].
Eva, KW ;
Cunnington, JPW ;
Reiter, HI ;
Keane, DR ;
Norman, GR .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2004, 9 (03) :211-224