Extended donor criteria for lung transplantation - a clinical reality

被引:96
作者
Aigner, C
Winkler, G
Jaksch, P
Seebacher, G
Lang, G
Taghavi, S
Wisser, W
Klepetko, W
机构
[1] Vienna Med Univ, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Koranyi Natl Inst Pulm, Thorac Surg Clin, Budapest, Hungary
关键词
lung transplantation; donors; presumed consent;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.01.024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Standard lung donor criteria have been established on opinions and individual experiences rather than on existing evidence. Since the scarcity of donor organs is one of the major limitations to lung transplantation, extension of donor lung criteria might considerably increase the donor pool. This study therefore evaluates the outcome, achieved with the use of extended donors versus standard donors and aims to redefine Lung donor criteria. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 98 consecutive primary lung transplantations from 94 donors from 1/2001 to 12/2002. Donors were classified as extended if they fulfilled at least one criteria: age > 55 years, PaO2 at FiO(2)/PEEP 5 < 300 mmHg, tobacco history > 20 pack years, inhalative drug abuse, presence of infiltration on chest X-ray or purulent secretions at bronchoscopy. Recipients were stratified in two groups according to whether they received a 'standard' or 'extended' organ. Postoperative complications, extubation time, ICU and hospital stay and survival were compared. Results: Twenty-three (24.5%) donors were extended. Twenty-six recipients (26.55%) received organs from extended donors. Differences in intubation times (12 +/- 2 days standard vs. 14 +/- 5 days extended, P=0.70), ICU stay (16 +/- 2 days standard vs. 18 +/- 5 days extended, P=0.74) and hospital stay (38 +/- 4 days standard vs. 40 6 days extended, P=0.71) were not statistically significant. Postoperative bleeding rates were comparable (n=14 standard vs. n=3 extended) as well as bronchial anastomotic complications (n=7 standard vs. n=3 extended). Three months survival was 88.89% in the standard group vs. 92.31% in the extended group. One year survival is comparable as well with 81.94 vs. 84.62%, respectively. Conclusions: The use of Lung donors who fait to meet standard criteria does not impair short and medium term results compared to standard lung donors. The impact on tong term development of BOS has yet to be evaluated. The strict application of standard lung donor criteria excludes a considerable number of lungs potentially suitable for transplantation, thus liberatisation of donor criteria might help to overcome donor shortage. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 760
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Lobar transplantation, split lung transplantation and peripheral segmental resection - reliable procedures for downsizing donor lungs
    Aigner, C
    Mazhar, S
    Jaksch, P
    Seebacher, G
    Taghavi, S
    Marta, G
    Wisser, W
    Klepetko, W
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 25 (02) : 179 - 183
  • [2] Liberalization of donor criteria may expand the donor pool without adverse consequence in lung transplantation
    Bhorade, SM
    Vigneswaran, W
    McCabe, MA
    Garrity, ER
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 19 (12) : 1199 - 1204
  • [3] The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Eighteenth official report-2001
    Hosenpud, JD
    Bennett, LE
    Keck, BM
    Boucek, MM
    Novick, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 20 (08) : 805 - 815
  • [4] Effect of donor age and ischemic time on intermediate survival and morbidity after lung transplantation
    Meyer, DM
    Bennett, LE
    Novick, RJ
    Hosenpud, JD
    [J]. CHEST, 2000, 118 (05) : 1255 - 1262
  • [5] Influence of graft ischemic time and donor age on survival after lung transplantation
    Novick, RJ
    Bennett, LE
    Meyer, DM
    Hosenpud, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 18 (05) : 425 - 431
  • [6] A review of lung transplant donor acceptability criteria
    Orens, JB
    Boehler, A
    de Perrot, M
    Estenne, M
    Glanville, AR
    Keshavjee, S
    Kotloff, R
    Morton, J
    Studer, SM
    Van Raemdonck, D
    Waddel, T
    Snell, GI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 22 (11) : 1183 - 1200
  • [7] PATTERSON GA, 1988, SURG CLIN N AM, V68, P545
  • [8] Marginal donor lungs: A reassessment
    Pierre, AF
    Sekine, Y
    Hutcheon, MA
    Waddell, TK
    Keshavjee, SH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 123 (03) : 421 - 428
  • [9] Evaluation of the eurotransplant senior program. The results of the first year
    Smits, JMA
    Persijn, GG
    van Houwelingen, HC
    Claas, FHJ
    Frei, U
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 2 (07) : 664 - 670
  • [10] Guidelines for the referral and management of patients eligible for solid organ transplantation
    Steinman, TI
    Becker, BN
    Frost, AE
    Olthoff, KM
    Smart, FW
    Suki, WN
    Wilkinson, AH
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 71 (09) : 1189 - 1204