A Stochastic Approach to LCA of Internal Insulation Solutions for Historic Buildings

被引:21
作者
Di Giuseppe, Elisa [1 ]
D'Orazio, Marco [1 ]
Du, Guangli [2 ]
Favi, Claudio [3 ]
Lasvaux, Sebastien [4 ]
Maracchini, Gianluca [1 ]
Padey, Pierryves [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Marche, Dept Civil & Bldg Engn & Architecture, Via Brecce Bianche 12, I-60131 Ancona, Italy
[2] Aalborg Univ, Dept Built Environm, AC Meyers Vaenge 15, DK-2450 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Parma, Dept Engn & Architecture, Parco Area Sci 181-A, I-43124 Parma, Italy
[4] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western Switzerland, IIES SO, Sch Management & Engn Vaud, Inst Thermal Engn, Ave Sports 20, CH-1401 Yverdon, Switzerland
关键词
historic building; energy efficiency; internal insulation; LCA; Monte-Carlo simulation; uncertainty analysis; EPD; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; THERMAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY; DESIGN; REFURBISHMENT; METHODOLOGY; VARIABLES; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.3390/su12041535
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Internal insulation is a typical renovation solution in historic buildings with valuable facades. However, it entails moisture-related risks, which affect the durability and life-cycle environmental performance. In this context, the EU project RIBuild developed a risk assessment method for both hygrothermal and life-cycle performance of internal insulation, to support decision-making. This paper presents the stochastic Life Cycle Assessment method developed, which couples the LCA model to a Monte-Carlo simulation, providing results expressed by probability distributions. It is applied to five insulation solutions, considering different uncertain input parameters and building heating scenarios. In addition, the influence of data variability and quality on the result is analyzed, by using input data from two sources: distributions derived from a generic Life Cycle Inventory database and "deterministic" data from Environmental Product Declarations. The outcomes highlight remarkable differences between the two datasets that lead to substantial variations on the systems performance ranking at the production stage. Looking at the life-cycle impact, the general trend of the output distributions is quite similar among simulation groups and insulation systems. Hence, while a ranking of the solutions based on a "deterministic" approach provides misleading information, the stochastic approach provides more realistic results in the context of decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, SEDENTARY BEHAVIOUR, P1
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, THESIS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment
  • [4] Principles and Framework
  • [5] The role of economic and policy variables in energy-efficient retrofitting assessment. A stochastic Life Cycle Costing methodology
    Baldoni, Edoardo
    Coderoni, Silvia
    D'Orazio, Marco
    Di Giuseppe, Elisa
    Esposti, Roberto
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 129 : 1207 - 1219
  • [6] Evaluation of natural-based internal insulation systems in historic buildings through a holistic approach
    Bottino-Leone, Dario
    Larcher, Marco
    Herrera-Avellanosa, Daniel
    Haas, Franziska
    Troi, Alexandra
    [J]. ENERGY, 2019, 181 : 521 - 531
  • [7] British Standards Institution, 2011, SUST CONST WORKS ASS, P1
  • [8] Sensitivity analysis of the use of Life Cycle Impact Assessment methods: a case study on building materials
    Bueno, Cristiane
    Hauschild, Michael Zwicky
    Rossignolo, Joao Adriano
    Ometto, Aldo Roberto
    Mendes, Natalia Crespo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 2208 - 2220
  • [9] Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review
    Cabeza, Luisa F.
    Rincon, Lidia
    Vilarino, Virginia
    Perez, Gabriel
    Castell, Albert
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 29 : 394 - 416
  • [10] Chouquet J., 2003, P INT C APPL COMP SC, P1