Linking leader-member exchange to employee voice behavior: The mediating role of self-efficacy

被引:7
作者
Liu, Jie [1 ]
Wang, Jia [2 ]
Geng, Zhibiao [2 ]
Wang, Yifu [3 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Macau, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong Shenzhen, Grad Sch, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY | 2021年 / 49卷 / 12期
关键词
leader-member exchange; voice behavior; self-efficacy; leadership; leader-follower relationship; ETHICAL LEADERSHIP; PERFORMANCE; LMX; TEAM;
D O I
10.2224/sbp.10950
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous studies have found a positive relationship between leader-member exchange (LMX) and employee voice behavior. However, little is known about the psychological mechanisms underlying this association. We examined self-efficacy as a mediator of the linkage between LMX and employee voice behavior by conducting a cross-sectional survey with a sample of 295 leader-follower dyads from a Chinese company. We performed structural equation modeling to analyze the data. Results show that LMX was positively related to employee voice behavior, and self-efficacy partially mediated the link between LMX and employee voice behavior. This research offers insight into the mechanistic processes through which LMX affects employee voice behavior, and indicates that organizations should pay attention to establishing high-quality LMX relationships to facilitate employee self-efficacy as well as voice behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Ahmadi S. A. A., 2014, International Journal of Research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, V2, P98
[2]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[3]  
Bandura A, 1999, COHERENCE OF PERSONALITY, P185
[4]   Employee Voice Behavior Interactive Effects of LMX and Power Distance in the United States and Colombia [J].
Botero, Isabel C. ;
Van Dyne, Linn .
MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2009, 23 (01) :84-104
[5]  
Burns J., 1999, HUM RESOUR DEV Q, V10, P225, DOI DOI 10.1002/HRDQ.3920100304
[6]   THE RISKS AND REWARDS OF SPEAKING UP: MANAGERIAL RESPONSES TO EMPLOYEE VOICE [J].
Burris, Ethan R. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 55 (04) :851-875
[7]   Leading to Stimulate Employees' Ideas: A Quantitative Review of Leader-Member Exchange, Employee Voice, Creativity, and Innovative Behavior [J].
Carnevale, Joel B. ;
Huang, Lei ;
Crede, Marcus ;
Harms, Peter ;
Uhl-Bien, Mary .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 2017, 66 (04) :517-552
[8]  
Chan S. C. H., 2015, NANG YAN BUSINESS J, V4, P44
[9]   IMPLICIT VOICE THEORIES: TAKEN-FOR-GRANTED RULES OF SELF-CENSORSHIP AT WORK [J].
Detert, James R. ;
Edmondson, Amy C. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 54 (03) :461-488
[10]   LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE MODEL OF LEADERSHIP - A CRITIQUE AND FURTHER DEVELOPMENT [J].
DIENESCH, RM ;
LIDEN, RC .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1986, 11 (03) :618-634