The detection of loose bodies in the elbow - The value of MRI and CT arthrography

被引:29
作者
Dubberley, JH
Faber, KJ
Patterson, SD
Garvin, G
Bennett, J
Romano, W
MacDermid, JC
King, GJW
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, St Josephs Hlth Ctr, Hand & Upper Limb Ctr, London, ON N6A 4L6, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, St Boniface Gen Hosp, Winnipeg, MB R2H 2A6, Canada
[3] Cent Florida Orthopaed Surg Assoc, Lakeland, FL 33803 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME | 2005年 / 87B卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.87B5.14851
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Our aim was to determine the clinical value of MRI and CT arthrography in predicting the presence of loose bodies in the elbow. A series of 26 patients with mechanical symptoms in the elbow had plain radiography, MRI and CT arthrography, followed by routine arthroscopy of the elbow. The location and number of loose bodies determined by MRI and CT arthrography were recorded. Preoperative plain radiography, MRI and CT arthrography were compared with arthroscopy. Both MRI and CT arthrography had excellent sensitivity (92% to 100%) but low to moderate specificity (15% to 77%) in identifying posteriorly-based loose bodies. Neither MRI nor CT arthrography was consistently sensitive (46% to 91%) or specific (13% to 73%) in predicting the presence or absence of loose bodies anteriorly. The overall sensitivity for the detection of loose bodies in either compartment was 88% to 100% and the specificity 20% to 70%. Pre-operative radiography had a similar sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 71%, respectively. Our results suggest that neither CT arthrography nor MRI is reliable or accurate enough to be any more effective than plain radiography alone in patients presenting with mechanical symptoms in the elbow.
引用
收藏
页码:684 / 686
页数:3
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   ARTHROSCOPY OF THE ELBOW - DIAGNOSIS AND EXTRACTION OF LOOSE BODIES [J].
BOE, S .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1986, 57 (01) :52-53
[2]  
Carrino John A., 1998, Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, V2, P397, DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1080120
[3]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[4]   Ultrasound of the elbow [J].
Martinoli, C ;
Bianchi, S ;
Giovagnorio, F ;
Pugliese, F .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 30 (11) :605-614
[5]   Detection of intraarticular bodies of the elbow with saline arthrosonography [J].
Miller, JH ;
Beggs, I .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 56 (03) :231-234
[6]   MR IMAGING OF THE ELBOW [J].
MURPHY, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (02) :525-529
[7]   ARTHROSCOPY OF THE ELBOW - DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC BENEFITS AND HAZARDS [J].
ODRISCOLL, SW ;
MORREY, BF .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1992, 74A (01) :84-94
[8]   ARTHROSCOPY OF THE ELBOW FOR REMOVAL OF LOOSE BODIES [J].
OGILVIEHARRIS, DJ ;
SCHEMITSCH, E .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1993, 9 (01) :5-8
[9]  
Palmer WE, 1996, TOP MAGN RESON IMAG, V8, P24
[10]   EVALUATION OF LOOSE BODIES IN THE ELBOW WITH MR-IMAGING [J].
QUINN, SF ;
HABERMAN, JJ ;
FITZGERALD, SW ;
TRAUGHBER, PD ;
BELKIN, RI ;
MURRAY, WT .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1994, 4 (02) :169-172