Combined anterior lumbar interbody fusion and instrumented posterolateral fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: indication and surgical outcomes

被引:26
作者
Hsieh, Ming-Kai
Chen, Lih-Huei
Niu, Chi-Chien
Fu, Tsai-Sheng
Lai, Po-Liang
Chen, Wen-Jer [1 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
关键词
Degenerative lumbar scoliosis; De novo scoliosis; Anterior lumbar interbody fusion; Instrumented fusion; OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT; SAGITTAL ALIGNMENT; ADULT SCOLIOSIS; POSTERIOR; COMPLICATIONS; RESTORATION; LORDOSIS; HEIGHT; CAGES; PAIN;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-015-0006-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Traditional approaches to deformity correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis include anterior-posterior approaches and posterior-only approaches. Most patients are treated with posterior-only approaches because the high complication rate of anterior approach. Our purpose is to compare and assess outcomes of combined anterior lumbar interbody fusion and instrumented posterolateral fusion with posterior alone approach for degenerative lumbar scoliosis with spinal stenosis. Methods: Between November 2002 and November 2011, a total of 110 patients with degenerative spinal deformity and curves measuring over 30 degrees were included. Of the 110 patients who underwent surgery, 56 underwent the combined anterior and posterior approach and 54 underwent posterior surgery at our institution. The following were the indications of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: (1) rigid or frank lumbar kyphosis, (2) anterior or lateral bridged traction osteophytes, (3) gross coronal and sagittal deformity or imbalance, and (4) severe disc space narrowing that is not identifiable when performing posterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Oswestry disability index and the visual analog scale. The status of fusion were assessed according to the radiographic findings. Results: All patients received clinical and radiographic follow-up for a minimum of 24 months, with an average follow-up of 53 months (range, 26-96 months). At the final follow-up, the mean ODI score improved from 28.8 to 6.4, and the mean back/leg VAS, from 8.2/5.5 to 2.1/0.9 in AP group and the mean ODI score improved from 29.1 to 6.2, and the mean back/leg VAS, from 9.0/6.5 to 2.3/0.5 in P group. The mean scoliotic angle changed from 41.3 degrees preoperatively to 9.3 degrees, and the lumbar lordotic angle, from 3.1 degrees preoperatively to 35.7 degrees in AP group and the mean scoliotic angle from 38.5 to 21.4 and the lumbar lordotic angle from 6 to 15.8 in P group. There were significant differences in sagittal (P = 0.009) and coronal (P = 0.02) plane correction between the two groups. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that combined anterior lumbar interbody fusion and instrumented posterolateral fusion for adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis effectively improves sagittal and coronal plane alignment than posterior group and both group were effectively improves clinical scores.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   The adult scoliosis [J].
Aebi, M .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2005, 14 (10) :925-948
[2]   Minimally Invasive Multilevel Percutaneous Correction and Fusion for Adult Lumbar Degenerative Scoliosis A Technique and Feasibility Study [J].
Anand, Neel ;
Baron, Eli M. ;
Thaiyananthan, Gowriharan ;
Khalsa, Kunwar ;
Goldstein, Theodore B. .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2008, 21 (07) :459-467
[3]   An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine Laboratory investigation [J].
Benglis, David M., Jr. ;
Vanni, Steve ;
Levi, Allan D. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2009, 10 (02) :139-144
[4]   Endoscopic lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine [J].
Bergey, DL ;
Villavicencio, AT ;
Goldstein, T ;
Regan, JJ .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (15) :1681-1688
[5]   Operative management of degenerative scoliosis: An evidence-based approach to surgical strategies based on clinical and radiographic outcomes [J].
Berven, Sigurd H. ;
Deviren, Vedat ;
Mitchell, Brian ;
Wahba, George ;
Hu, Serena S. ;
Bradford, David S. .
NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2007, 18 (02) :261-+
[6]   Adult degenerative scoliosis: A review [J].
Birknes, John K. ;
White, Andrew P. ;
Albert, Todd J. ;
Shaffrey, Christopher I. ;
Harrop, James S. .
NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 63 (03) :A94-A103
[7]  
Blumenthal Scott L, 2003, Spine J, V3, P301, DOI 10.1016/S1529-9430(03)00004-4
[8]   Adult scoliosis: Surgical indications, operative management, complications, and outcomes [J].
Bradford, DS ;
Tay, BKB ;
Hu, SS .
SPINE, 1999, 24 (24) :2617-2629
[9]  
Cobb J., 1948, INSTRUCTIONAL COURSE, V5, P261
[10]   Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion as an Adjunct to Posterior Instrumented Correction of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis [J].
Crandall, Dennis G. ;
Revella, Jan .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (20) :2126-2133