The Effect of Different Condition of Pulpal Pressure on Microtensile Bond Strength of Several Dentin Bonding Agents on Deep and Superficial Dentin

被引:2
|
作者
Montanari, Marco [1 ]
Fiorillo, Luca [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cervino, Gabriele [2 ]
Sambataro, Sergio [2 ]
Herford, Alan Scott [5 ]
Cicciu, Marco [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ferrara, Dept Prosthodont, Via Luigi Borsari 46, I-44121 Ferrara, Italy
[2] Univ Messina, Dept Biomed & Dent Sci, Morphol & Funct Images, Policlin G Martino, Via Consolare Valeria, I-98100 Messina, Italy
[3] Univ Naples 2, Multidisciplinary Dept Med Surg & Dent Specialtie, I-80100 Naples, Italy
[4] Univ Aldent, Dept Dent, Tirana 1000, Albania
[5] Loma Linda Univ, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Loma Linda, CA 92354 USA
关键词
pulpal pressure; microtensile bond strength; permeability; hydrophilic monomers; hybrid layer; dentin bonding systems; SEM; SELF-ETCH; IN-VITRO; INTRAPULPAL PRESSURE; FLUID MOVEMENT; WATER SORPTION; HYBRID LAYER; PERMEABILITY; ADHESIVES; STEP; OCCLUSION;
D O I
10.3390/ma14206200
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to examine the effect of different conditions of simulated hydrostatic pulpal pressure on the mu TBS of HEMA-based and HEMA-free dentin bonding agents (DBAs). The influence of dentin location (deep and superficial) on mu TBS was also evaluated. Flat coronal dentin surfaces of extracted human molars were prepared. Three groups of resin-bonded specimens were exposed to different pulpal pressures. Pulpal pressure was maintained for 20 min for each group. A flowable resin composite was used for coronal build-up. The bonded teeth were sectioned and, after 24 h of water storage, stressed to failure using the microtensile tester (mu TBS). Failed samples were analyzed by SEM inspection. HEMA-based DBAs were much more sensitive to pulpal pressure conditions than non-HEMA-containing DBAs. Pulpal pressure had a greater influence in deep dentin. The HEMA-free DBA was insensitive to the presence or absence of pulpal pressure condition. SEM inspection confirmed a relationship between the presence of voids inside the HEMA-based DBAs layer and the lower mu TBS results. HEMA-based DBAs are more sensitive to pulpal pressure conditions than HEMA-free DBAs. Interestingly, HEMA-free DBA showed a greater number of water droplets at resin-dentin interface in all tested conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Microtensile bond strength of different bonding agents to dentin.
    Mauricio, P
    Osorio, E
    Toledano, M
    Osorio, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : 577 - 577
  • [2] The effect of different acid concentrations on the microtensile bond strength of two dentin bonding agents.
    Zidan, O
    El-Malky, W
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A160 - A160
  • [3] The effect of different etching times on the microtensile bond strength of two dentin bonding agents.
    El-Malky, W
    Zidan, O
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A160 - A160
  • [4] Microtensile dentin adhesive bond strength under different positive pulpal pressures
    Purk, John H.
    Dusevich, Vladimir
    Atwood, Jared
    Spencer, Becca Dawson
    Kruse, Dustin
    Webb, Tyler
    Williams, Angela
    Tira, Daniel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2009, 22 (06): : 357 - 360
  • [5] Microtensile bond strength of several adhesive systems to different dentin depths
    Toledano, M
    Osorio, R
    Ceballos, L
    Fuentes, MV
    Fernandes, CAO
    Tay, FR
    Carvalho, RM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2003, 16 (05): : 292 - 298
  • [6] THE EFFECT OF DENTIN SURFACE MOISTURE ON BOND STRENGTH TO DENTIN BONDING AGENTS
    CHARLTON, DG
    BEATTY, MW
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 1994, 19 (04) : 154 - 158
  • [7] Effect of hydrostatic pulpal water pressure on microtensile bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin
    Abdalla, Ali I.
    Elsayed, Hussein Y.
    Garcia-Godoy, Franklin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2008, 21 (04): : 233 - 238
  • [8] A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin
    Burrow, MF
    Nopnakeepong, U
    Phrukkanon, S
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2002, 18 (03) : 239 - 245
  • [9] Effect of desensitizer on microtensile bond strength to dentin
    Geraldeli, S
    Castilhos, N
    Mandelli, A
    Furlani, JCG
    Perdigào, J
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 195 - 195
  • [10] Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin bond strength of self-etching bonding systems
    Moll, K
    Park, HJ
    Haller, B
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2005, 18 (05): : 335 - 339