The importance of government commitment in attracting firms: A dynamic analysis of tax competition in an agglomeration economy

被引:9
作者
Kato, Hayato [1 ]
机构
[1] Hitotsubashi Univ, Grad Sch Econ, Kunitachi, Tokyo 1868601, Japan
关键词
Economic geography; Tax competition; Differential games; Commitment; Forward-looking behavior; CORE-PERIPHERY MODEL; EXPECTATIONS; GEOGRAPHY; INTEGRATION; CAPACITY; HISTORY; STATES; TRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.11.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Agglomeration tendencies of industrial firms significantly affect the nature of tax competition. This paper analyzes tax competition between two countries over an infinite time horizon in an economy with trade costs and internationally mobile industrial firms. Most of the previous studies on tax competition in the 'new economic geography' framework employ static models. In this study, two governments dynamically compete with each other to attract firms through their choices of taxes and subsidies. It is shown that the commitment of the governments to their policies is crucial in determining the distribution of firms in the long run. Specifically, if governments find each others' tax policies credible, then one country will attract all the firms when trade costs are low enough to make agglomeration forces dominant. If policies are not credible, both countries may attract an equal share of firms even when trade costs are low, as the lack of commitment by governments acts as a dispersion force. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 78
页数:22
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIFFERENTIAL GAMES E
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Economics of agglomeration: cities, industrial location, and globalization
[3]   Agglomeration, integration and tax harmonisation [J].
Baldwin, RE ;
Krugman, P .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2004, 48 (01) :1-23
[4]   Core-periphery model with forward-looking expectations [J].
Baldwin, RE .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2001, 31 (01) :21-49
[5]  
Baldwin Richard., 2003, Economic Geography and Public Policy
[6]   Tax Competition with Heterogeneous Firms [J].
Baldwin, Richard E. ;
Okubo, Toshihiro .
SPATIAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, 2014, 9 (03) :309-326
[7]   Agglomeration and tax competition [J].
Borck, R ;
Pflüger, M .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 50 (03) :647-668
[8]   Do agglomeration economies reduce the sensitivity of firm location to tax differentials? [J].
Bruelhart, Marius ;
Jametti, Mario ;
Schmidheiny, Kurt .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2012, 122 (563) :1069-1093
[9]   Market access effect and local tax setting: evidence from French panel data [J].
Charlot, Sylvie ;
Paty, Sonia .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2007, 7 (03) :247-263
[10]  
Coulibaly S., 2008, EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT