Environmental systems analysis of pig production - The impact of feed choice

被引:99
|
作者
Eriksson, IS
Elmquist, H
Stern, S
Nybrant, T
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Biometry & Engn, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Breeding & Genet, SE-75597 Uppsala, Sweden
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT | 2005年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
crude protein; feed production; growing-finishing; pigs; pig production; soybean meal; synthetic amino acids; systems analysis;
D O I
10.1065/lca2004.06.160
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Goal, Scope and Method. The purpose of this environmental system analysis was to investigate the impact of feed choice in three pig production scenarios using substance flow models complemented by life cycle assessment methodology. The function of the system studied was to grow piglets of 29 kg to finished pigs of 115 kg. Three alternative scenarios of protein supply were designed, one based on imported soybean meal (scenario SOY); one based on locally grown peas and rapeseed cake (scenario PEA) and one based on Swedish peas and rapeseed meal complemented by synthetic amino acids (scenario SAA). The environmental impact of both feed production as such and the subsequent environmental impact of the feed in the pig production sub-system were analysed. The analysed feed ingredients were barley, wheat, peas, rapeseed meal, rapeseed cake, soybean meal and synthetic amino acids. The crude protein level of the feed affected the nitrogen content in the manure, which in turn affected nitrogen emissions throughout the system and the fertilising value of the manure, ultimately affecting the need for mineral fertiliser application for feed production. Results and Discussion. The results showed that feed production contributed more than animal husbandry to the environmental burden of the system for the impact categories energy use, global warming potential and eutrophication, whereas the opposite situation was the case for acidification. The environmental impacts of scenarios SOY, PEA and SAA were 6.8, 5.3 and 6.3 MJ/kg pig growth; 1.5, 1.3 and 1.4 kg CO2-eq/kg pig growth; 0.55, 0.55 and 0.45 kg O-2-eq/kg pig growth; and 24, 25 and 20 g SO2-eq/kg pig growth, respectively. The results suggested that scenario SAA was environmentally preferable, and that the reason for this was a low crude protein level of the feed and exclusion of soybean meal from the feed. Conclusions. Feed choice had an impact on the environmental performance of pig meat production, not only via the features of the feed as fed to the pigs, such as the crude protein content, but also via the raw materials used, since the environmental impact from the production of these differs and since feed production had a large impact on the system as a whole.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 154
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Challenges and opportunities of smallholder pig production systems in Rwanda
    Hirwa, Claire D'Andre
    Mutabazi, Jules
    Nsabimana, Jean De Dieu
    Dusengemungu, Leonidas
    Kayitesi, Aline
    Semahoro, Fabrice
    Uwimana, Gaspard
    Nyabinwa, Pascal
    Kugonza, Donald Rugira
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2022, 54 (05)
  • [42] Challenges and opportunities of smallholder pig production systems in Rwanda
    Claire d’Andre Hirwa
    Jules Mutabazi
    Jean De Dieu Nsabimana
    Leonidas Dusengemungu
    Aline Kayitesi
    Fabrice Semahoro
    Gaspard Uwimana
    Pascal Nyabinwa
    Donald Rugira Kugonza
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2022, 54
  • [43] A description of smallholder pig production systems in eastern Indonesia
    Leslie, Edwina E. C.
    Geong, Maria
    Abdurrahman, Muktasam
    Ward, Michael P.
    Toribio, Jenny-Ann L. M. L.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2015, 118 (04) : 319 - 327
  • [44] The Impact of Sire EBV for Growth and Feed Intake on Pig Activity Level Using Nuutrack
    Obermier, Dalton R.
    Rathje, Tom
    Schmidt, Ty B.
    Mote, Benny E.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 100 : 10 - 10
  • [45] Nutrition, key factor to reduce environmental load from pig production
    Aarnink, A. J. A.
    Verstegen, M. W. A.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2007, 109 (1-3) : 194 - 203
  • [46] Environmental assessment of pig production in Cienfuegos, Cuba: alternatives for manure management
    Sagastume Gutierrez, Alexis
    Cabello Eras, Juan J.
    Billen, Pieter
    Vandecasteele, Carlo
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 2518 - 2528
  • [47] Impact of weekly random out-of-feed events and feed particle size on grow-finish pig performance.
    Brumm, M.
    Colgan, S.
    Bruns, K.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 84 : 115 - 116
  • [48] Non-typhoidal Salmonella in the Pig Production Chain: A Comprehensive Analysis of Its Impact on Human Health
    Campos, Joana
    Mourao, Joana
    Peixe, Luisa
    Antunes, Patricia
    PATHOGENS, 2019, 8 (01):
  • [49] Integrated resource-driven pig production systems in a mountainous area of Northeast India: production practices and pig performance
    A. Kumaresan
    K. M. Bujarbaruah
    K. A. Pathak
    Anubrata Das
    R. K. Bardoloi
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2009, 41 : 1187 - 1196
  • [50] Integrated resource-driven pig production systems in a mountainous area of Northeast India: production practices and pig performance
    Kumaresan, A.
    Bujarbaruah, K. M.
    Pathak, K. A.
    Das, Anubrata
    Bardoloi, R. K.
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2009, 41 (07) : 1187 - 1196