Environmental systems analysis of pig production - The impact of feed choice

被引:99
|
作者
Eriksson, IS
Elmquist, H
Stern, S
Nybrant, T
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Biometry & Engn, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Breeding & Genet, SE-75597 Uppsala, Sweden
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT | 2005年 / 10卷 / 02期
关键词
crude protein; feed production; growing-finishing; pigs; pig production; soybean meal; synthetic amino acids; systems analysis;
D O I
10.1065/lca2004.06.160
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Goal, Scope and Method. The purpose of this environmental system analysis was to investigate the impact of feed choice in three pig production scenarios using substance flow models complemented by life cycle assessment methodology. The function of the system studied was to grow piglets of 29 kg to finished pigs of 115 kg. Three alternative scenarios of protein supply were designed, one based on imported soybean meal (scenario SOY); one based on locally grown peas and rapeseed cake (scenario PEA) and one based on Swedish peas and rapeseed meal complemented by synthetic amino acids (scenario SAA). The environmental impact of both feed production as such and the subsequent environmental impact of the feed in the pig production sub-system were analysed. The analysed feed ingredients were barley, wheat, peas, rapeseed meal, rapeseed cake, soybean meal and synthetic amino acids. The crude protein level of the feed affected the nitrogen content in the manure, which in turn affected nitrogen emissions throughout the system and the fertilising value of the manure, ultimately affecting the need for mineral fertiliser application for feed production. Results and Discussion. The results showed that feed production contributed more than animal husbandry to the environmental burden of the system for the impact categories energy use, global warming potential and eutrophication, whereas the opposite situation was the case for acidification. The environmental impacts of scenarios SOY, PEA and SAA were 6.8, 5.3 and 6.3 MJ/kg pig growth; 1.5, 1.3 and 1.4 kg CO2-eq/kg pig growth; 0.55, 0.55 and 0.45 kg O-2-eq/kg pig growth; and 24, 25 and 20 g SO2-eq/kg pig growth, respectively. The results suggested that scenario SAA was environmentally preferable, and that the reason for this was a low crude protein level of the feed and exclusion of soybean meal from the feed. Conclusions. Feed choice had an impact on the environmental performance of pig meat production, not only via the features of the feed as fed to the pigs, such as the crude protein content, but also via the raw materials used, since the environmental impact from the production of these differs and since feed production had a large impact on the system as a whole.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 154
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Forage plants as an alternative feed resource for sustainable pig production in the tropics: a review
    Kambashi, B.
    Boudry, C.
    Picron, P.
    Bindelle, J.
    ANIMAL, 2014, 8 (08) : 1298 - 1311
  • [32] Assessing and reducing the environmental impact of dairy production systems in the northern US in a changing climate
    Veltman, Karin
    Rotz, C. Alan
    Chase, Larry
    Cooper, Joyce
    Forest, Chris E.
    Ingraham, Peter A.
    Izaurralde, R. Cesar
    Jones, Curtis D.
    Nicholas, Robert E.
    Ruark, Matthew D.
    Salas, William
    Thoma, Greg
    Jolliet, Olivier
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 192
  • [33] Genetic and environmental trends for production traits in the Slovakian pig population
    Peskovicová, D
    Groeneveld, E
    Kumicík, M
    Hetényi, L
    Demo, P
    CZECH JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1999, 44 (10) : 447 - 455
  • [34] Impact of Formaldehyde Treated Pig Feed Containing Spray Dried Plasma on Weaned Pig Growth Performance.
    Campbell, J. M.
    Crenshaw, J. D.
    Polo, J.
    Mellick, D.
    Bienhoff, M.
    Stein, H. H.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 : 138 - 139
  • [35] Impact of organic pig production systems on CO2 emission, C sequestration and nitrate pollution
    Halberg, Niels
    Hermansen, John E.
    Kristensen, Ib Sillebak
    Eriksen, Jorgen
    Tvedegaard, Niels
    Petersen, Bjorn Molt
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 30 (04) : 721 - 731
  • [36] Impact of organic pig production systems on CO2 emission, C sequestration and nitrate pollution
    Niels Halberg
    John E. Hermansen
    Ib Sillebak Kristensen
    Jørgen Eriksen
    Niels Tvedegaard
    Bjørn Molt Petersen
    Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2010, 30 : 721 - 731
  • [37] The impact of VietGAHP implementation on Vietnamese households’ pig production
    Ly Thi Nguyen
    Teruaki Nanseki
    Yosuke Chomei
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2020, 22 : 7701 - 7725
  • [38] The impact of VietGAHP implementation on Vietnamese households' pig production
    Ly Thi Nguyen
    Nanseki, Teruaki
    Chomei, Yosuke
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 22 (08) : 7701 - 7725
  • [39] The Environmental Impact of Lowering Dietary Crude Protein in Finishing Pig Diets-The Effect on Ammonia, Odour and Slurry Production
    Ball, M. Elizabeth E.
    Smyth, Sam
    Beattie, Violet E.
    McCracken, Kelvin J.
    McCormack, Ursula
    Muns, Ramon
    Gordon, Fred J.
    Bradford, Raymond
    Reid, L. Alanna
    Magowan, Elizabeth
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [40] Biosecurity practices on intensive pig production systems in Chile
    Pinto, CJ
    Urcelay, VS
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2003, 59 (03) : 139 - 145