Sensory attenuation in the absence of movement: Differentiating motor action from sense of agency

被引:10
作者
Han, Nathan [1 ]
Jack, Bradley N. [2 ]
Hughes, Gethin [3 ]
Elijah, Ruth B. [1 ]
Whitford, Thomas J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Psychol, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Psychol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Univ Essex, Dept Psychol, Colchester, Essex, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Sensory attenuation; N1; Sense of agency; Event-related potentials (ERP); COROLLARY DISCHARGE DYSFUNCTION; SELF-GENERATED SOUNDS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE; EVOKED-RESPONSES; INITIATED SOUNDS; BRAIN RESPONSES; AUDITORY ERPS; N1; WAVE; SUPPRESSION; COMPONENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.cortex.2021.04.010
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Sensory attenuation is the phenomenon that stimuli generated by willed motor actions elicit a smaller neurophysiological response than those generated by external sources. It has mostly been investigated in the auditory domain, by comparing ERPs evoked by self initiated (active condition) and externally-generated (passive condition) sounds. The mechanistic basis of sensory attenuation has been argued to involve a duplicate of the motor command being used to predict sensory consequences of self-generated movements. An alternative possibility is that the effect is driven by between-condition differences in participants' sense of agency over the sound. In this paper, we disambiguated the effects of motor-action and sense of agency on sensory attenuation with a novel experimental paradigm. In Experiment 1, participants watched a moving, marked tickertape while EEG was recorded. In the active condition, participants chose whether to press a button by a certain mark on the tickertape. If a button-press had not occurred by the mark, then a tone would be played 1 s later. If the button was pressed prior to the mark, the tone was not played. In the passive condition, participants passively watched the animation, and were informed about whether a tone would be played on each trial. The design for Experiment 2 was identical, except that the contingencies were reversed (i.e., a button press by the mark led to a tone). The results were consistent across the two experiments: while there were no differences in N1 amplitude between the active and passive conditions, the amplitude of the Tb component was suppressed in the active condition. The amplitude of the P2 component was enhanced in the active condition in both Experiments 1 and 2. These results suggest that motor-actions and sense of agency have differential effects on sensory attenuation to sounds and are indexed with different ERP components. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 448
页数:13
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] ADLER G, 1989, AUDIOLOGY, V28, P316
  • [2] Activation of duration-sensitive auditory cortical fields in humans
    Alain, C
    Woods, DL
    Covarrubias, D
    [J]. EVOKED POTENTIALS-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 104 (06): : 531 - 539
  • [3] Allen Micah, 2019, Wellcome Open Res, V4, P63, DOI 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.1
  • [4] The correlation between central auditory processing in autistic children and their language processing abilities
    Azouz, Hanan Galal
    Kozou, Hesham
    Khalil, Mona
    Abdou, Rania M.
    Sakr, Mohamed
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2014, 78 (12) : 2297 - 2300
  • [5] Selective suppression of self-initiated sounds in an auditory stream: An ERP study
    Baess, Pamela
    Horvath, Janos
    Jacobsen, Thomas
    Schroeger, Erich
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 48 (09) : 1276 - 1283
  • [6] Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: Evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation
    Baess, Pamela
    Jacobsen, Thomas
    Schroeger, Erich
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 70 (02) : 137 - 143
  • [7] Beagley H A, 1967, J Laryngol Otol, V81, P861, DOI 10.1017/S0022215100067815
  • [8] Abnormalities in the awareness of action
    Blakemore, SJ
    Wolpert, DM
    Frith, CD
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2002, 6 (06) : 237 - 242
  • [9] Why can't you tickle yourself?
    Blakemore, SJ
    Wolpert, D
    Frith, C
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 2000, 11 (11) : R11 - R16
  • [10] The psychophysics toolbox
    Brainard, DH
    [J]. SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04): : 433 - 436