Ctp1-dependent clipping and resection of DNA double-strand breaks by Mre11 endonuclease complex are not genetically separable

被引:15
|
作者
Jensen, Kristi L. [1 ]
Russell, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Scripps Res Inst, Dept Cell & Mol Biol, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES-POMBE; END RESECTION; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; RAD32(MRE11) NUCLEASE; TOPOISOMERASE-I; FISSION YEAST; S-POMBE; REPAIR; GENE; EXO1;
D O I
10.1093/nar/gkw557
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Homologous recombination (HR) repair of programmed meiotic double-strand breaks (DSBs) requires endonucleolytic clipping of Rec12(Spo11)-oligonucleotides from 5' DNA ends followed by resection to generate invasive 3' single-stranded DNA tails. The Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) endonuclease and Ctp1 (CtIP and Sae2 ortholog) are required for both activities in fission yeast but whether they are genetically separable is controversial. Here, we investigate the mitotic DSB repair properties of Ctp1 C-terminal domain (ctp1-CD) mutants that were reported to be specifically clipping deficient. These mutants are sensitive to many clastogens, including those that create DSBs devoid of covalently bound proteins. These sensitivities are suppressed by genetically eliminating Ku nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) protein, indicating that Ctp1-dependent clipping by MRN is required for Ku removal from DNA ends. However, this rescue requires Exo1 resection activity, implying that Ctp1-dependent resection by MRN is defective in ctp1-CD mutants. The ctp1-CD mutants tolerate one but not multiple broken replication forks, and they are highly reliant on the Chk1-mediated cell cycle checkpoint arrest, indicating that HR repair is inefficient. We conclude that the C-terminal domain of Ctp1 is required for both efficient clipping and resection of DSBs by MRN and these activities are mechanistically similar.
引用
收藏
页码:8241 / 8249
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bidirectional resection of DNA double-strand breaks by Mre11 and Exo1
    Garcia, Valerie
    Phelps, Sarah E. L.
    Gray, Stephen
    Neale, Matthew J.
    NATURE, 2011, 479 (7372) : 241 - U123
  • [2] Bidirectional resection of DNA double-strand breaks by Mre11 and Exo1
    Valerie Garcia
    Sarah E. L. Phelps
    Stephen Gray
    Matthew J. Neale
    Nature, 2011, 479 : 241 - 244
  • [3] ATM and the Mre11 complex combine to recognize and signal DNA double-strand breaks
    Lavin, M. F.
    ONCOGENE, 2007, 26 (56) : 7749 - 7758
  • [4] ATM and the Mre11 complex combine to recognize and signal DNA double-strand breaks
    M F Lavin
    Oncogene, 2007, 26 : 7749 - 7758
  • [5] The Mre11/Rad50 complex and its roles in processing of DNA double-strand breaks
    Paull, Tanya T.
    Nicolette, Matthew
    Lengsefld, Bettina
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2008, 22
  • [6] Processing by MRE11 is involved in the sensitivity of subtelomeric regions to DNA double-strand breaks
    Muraki, Keiko
    Han, Limei
    Miller, Douglas
    Murnane, John P.
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2015, 43 (16) : 7911 - 7930
  • [7] MRE11 promotes AKT phosphorylation in direct response to DNA double-strand breaks
    Fraser, Michael
    Harding, Shane M.
    Zhao, Helen
    Coackley, Carla
    Durocher, Daniel
    Bristow, Robert G.
    CELL CYCLE, 2011, 10 (13) : 2218 - 2232
  • [8] The 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity of Mre11 facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks
    Paull, TT
    Gellert, M
    MOLECULAR CELL, 1998, 1 (07) : 969 - 979
  • [9] Analysis of MRE11's function in the 5′→3′ processing of DNA double-strand breaks
    Liao, Shuren
    Guay, Catherine
    Toczylowski, Thomas
    Yan, Hong
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2012, 40 (10) : 4496 - 4506
  • [10] The 9-1-1 Complex Controls Mre11 Nuclease and Checkpoint Activation during Short-Range Resection of DNA Double-Strand Breaks
    Gobbini, Elisa
    Casari, Erika
    Colombo, Chiara Vittoria
    Bonetti, Diego
    Longhese, Maria Pia
    CELL REPORTS, 2020, 33 (03):