Rotordynamic Force Coefficients for Three Types of Annular Gas Seals With Inlet Preswirl and High Differential Pressure Ratio

被引:130
作者
Ertas, B. H. [1 ]
Delgado, A. [1 ]
Vannini, G. [2 ]
机构
[1] GE Res Ctr, Rotating Equipment Grp, Niskayuna, NY 12390 USA
[2] GE Oil & Gas, Adv Technol Org, Conceptual Adv Mech Design, I-50127 Florence, Italy
来源
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2012年 / 134卷 / 04期
关键词
compressors; mechanical testing; rotors; seals (stoppers); shock absorbers;
D O I
10.1115/1.4004537
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The following paper presents and compares rotordynamic force coefficients for three types of non-contact annular gas seals, which include a labyrinth (LABY), honeycomb (HC), and a fully partitioned damper seal (FPDS). These three annular seals represent the typical seal types used in process gas centrifugal compressors at the balance piston location or center seal location to limit internal leakage and ensure a robust rotordynamic design. Tests were conducted on 170.6 mm (6.716 in) diameter seals for rotor speeds up to 15 kprm, inlet air pressure of 6.9 bar (100 psi), ambient back pressure, and with inlet gas preswirl. The three seals were designed to have the same nominal clearance and similar axial lengths. Testing was conducted on a controlled motion test rig possessing non-synchronous excitation capability up to 250 Hz. Three different test methods were employed to give confidence in the rotordynamic coefficients, which include static force deflection tests, mechanical impedance tests, and dynamic cavity pressure tests. Results from experiments compare force coefficients for all seal configurations while paying special attention to the crossover frequencies of the effective damping term. All seals possessed negative effective damping at lower excitation frequencies with inlet preswirl, where the straight-through FPDS possessed the lowest cross over frequency of 40 Hz at 15 krpm. The testing also revealed that the preswirl parameter had significantly more influence on effective damping levels and crossover frequencies when compared to rotor speed. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4004537]
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] PROTECTING TURBOMACHINERY FROM SELF-EXCITED ROTOR WHIRL
    ALFORD, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR POWER, 1965, 87 (04): : 333 - &
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, P 26 TURB S, DOI DOI 10.21423/R1HT06
  • [3] Benckert H., 1980, NASA CP, V2133, P189
  • [4] CHILDS D, 1994, J TRIBOL-T ASME, V116, P337, DOI 10.1115/1.2927226
  • [5] Childs D. W., 2008, ASME ENG GAS TURBINE, V130
  • [6] Measurements versus predictions for the dynamic impedance of annular gas seals - Part II: Smooth and honeycomb geometries
    Dawson, MP
    Childs, DW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2002, 124 (04): : 963 - 970
  • [7] Rotordynamic force coefficients of pocket damper seals
    Ertas, B.
    Gamal, A.
    Vance, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2006, 128 (04): : 725 - 737
  • [8] Rotordynamic force coefficients for a new damper seal design
    Ertas, Bugra H.
    John, Vanee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2007, 129 (02): : 365 - 374
  • [9] LI J, 2002, P 47 ASME TURB EXP L, P230
  • [10] Rotordynamic coefficients for a tooth-on-stator labyrinth seal at 70 bar supply pressures: Measurements versus theory and comparisons to a hole-pattern stator seal
    Picardo, A
    Childs, DW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2005, 127 (04): : 843 - 855