An Integrated Approach for Main Path Analysis: Development of the Hirsch Index as an Example

被引:249
作者
Liu, John S. [1 ]
Lu, Louis Y. Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Inst Technol Management, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
[2] Yuan Ze Univ, Coll Management, Chungli 32003, Taiwan
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2012年 / 63卷 / 03期
关键词
H-INDEX; BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS; CITATION ANALYSIS; R-INDEX; IMPACT; SCIENTISTS; NETWORKS; PUBLICATIONS; TRAJECTORIES; PHYSICISTS;
D O I
10.1002/asi.21692
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This study enhances main path analysis by proposing several variants to the original approach. Main path analysis is a bibliometric method capable of tracing the most significant paths in a citation network and is commonly used to trace the development trajectory of a research field. We highlight several limitations of the original main path analysis and suggest new, complementary approaches to overcome these limitations. In contrast to the original local main path, the new approaches generate the global main path, the backward local main path, multiple main paths, and key-route main paths. Each of them is obtained via a perspective different from the original approach. By simultaneously conducting the new, complementary approaches, one uncovers the key development of the target discipline from a broader view. To demonstrate the value of these new approaches, we simultaneously apply them to a set of academic articles related to the Hirsch index. The results show that the integrated approach discovers several paths that are not captured by the original approach. Among these new approaches, the key-route approach is especially useful and hints at a divergence-convergence-divergence structure in the development of the Hirsch index.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 542
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields [J].
Alonso, S. ;
Cabrerizo, F. J. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. ;
Herrera, F. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2009, 3 (04) :273-289
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Connections
[3]  
[Anonymous], U LJUBLJANA PREPRINT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1964, The Use of Citation Data in Writing the History of Science
[5]  
ASIMOV I, 1963, GENETIC CODE
[6]   Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? [J].
Batista, Pablo D. ;
Campiteli, Monica G. ;
Kinouchi, Osame ;
Martinez, Alexandre S. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 68 (01) :179-189
[7]   Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? [J].
Bornmann, L ;
Daniel, HD .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2005, 65 (03) :391-392
[8]   What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior [J].
Bornmann, Luti ;
Daniel, Hans-Dieter .
JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 2008, 64 (01) :45-80
[9]   Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index?: a comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Mutz, Ruediger ;
Daniel, Hans-Dieter .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 59 (05) :830-837
[10]   What do we know about the h index? [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Daniel, Hans-Dieter .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 58 (09) :1381-1385