Combining Brine Extraction, Desalination, and Residual-Brine Reinjection with CO2 Storage in Saline Formations: Implications for Pressure Management, Capacity, and Risk Mitigation

被引:93
作者
Buscheck, Thomas A. [1 ]
Sun, Yunwei [1 ]
Hao, Yue [1 ]
Wolery, Thomas J. [1 ]
Bourcier, William [1 ]
Tompson, Andrew F. B. [1 ]
Jones, Edwin D. [1 ]
Friedmann, S. Julio [1 ]
Aines, Roger D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
来源
10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES | 2011年 / 4卷
关键词
CO2; storage; Saline formations; Pressure buildup; Reservoir management; Risk mitigation; Area of Review; Reverse Osmosis;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.378
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
For industrial-scale CO2 injection in saline formations, pressure increase can be a limiting factor in storage capacity. To address this concern, we introduce Active CO2 Reservoir Management (ACRM), which combines brine extraction and residual-brine reinjection with CO2 injection, contrasting it with the conventional approach, which we call Passive CO2 Reservoir Management. ACRM reduces pressure buildup and CO2 and brine migration, which increases storage capacity. Also, "push-pull" manipulation of the CO2 plume can counteract buoyancy, exposing less of the caprock seal to CO2 and more of the storage formation to CO2, with a greater fraction of the formation utilized for trapping mechanisms. If the net extracted volume of brine is equal to the injected CO2 volume, pressure buildup is minimized, greatly reducing the Area of Review, and the risk of seal degradation, fault activation, and induced seismicity. Moreover, CO2 and brine migration will be unaffected by neighboring CO2 operations, which allows planning, assessing, and conducting of each operation to be carried out independently. In addition, ACRM creates a new product, as extracted brine is available as a feedstock for desalination technologies, such as Reverse Osmosis. These benefits can offset brine extraction and treatment costs, streamline permitting, and help gain public acceptance. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:4283 / 4290
页数:8
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
AINES RD, 2010, P 10 INT C GREENH GA
[2]   CO2 storage in geological media:: Role, means, status and barriers to deployment [J].
Bachu, Stefan .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2008, 34 (02) :254-273
[3]   Basin-scale hydrogeologic impacts of CO2 storage: Capacity and regulatory implications [J].
Birkholzer, Jens T. ;
Zhou, Quanlin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2009, 3 (06) :745-756
[4]  
Carroll S., 2008, P 9 INT C GREENH GAS
[5]  
COURT B, 2010, P 10 INT C GREENH GA
[6]  
*IEA INT EN AG, 2007, GREENH GAS R D PROGR
[7]  
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2005, Climate Change (2021). The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
[8]   A CLOSED-FORM EQUATION FOR PREDICTING THE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF UNSATURATED SOILS [J].
VANGENUCHTEN, MT .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1980, 44 (05) :892-898
[9]   A method for quick assessment of CO2 storage capacity in closed and semi-closed saline formations [J].
Zhou, Quanlin ;
Birkholzer, Jens T. ;
Tsang, Chin-Fu ;
Rutqvist, Jonny .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2008, 2 (04) :626-639