Why Travel for Complex Cancer Surgery? Americans React to "Brand-Sharing' Between Specialty Cancer Hospitals and Their Affiliates

IntroductionLeading cancer hospitals have increasingly shared their brand' with smaller hospitals through affiliations. Because each brand evokes a distinct reputation for the care provided, brand-sharing' has the potential to impact the public's ability to differentiate the safety and quality within hospital networks. The general public was surveyed to determine the perceived similarities and differences in the safety and quality of complex cancer surgery performed at top cancer hospitals and their smaller affiliate hospitals.MethodsA national, web-based KnowledgePanel (GfK) survey of American adults was conducted. Respondents were asked about their beliefs regarding the quality and safety of complex cancer surgery at a large, top-ranked cancer hospital and a smaller, local hospital, both in the presence and absence of an affiliation between the hospitals.ResultsA total of 1010 surveys were completed (58.1% response rate). Overall, 85% of respondents felt motivated' to travel an hour for complex surgery at a larger hospital specializing in cancer, over a smaller local hospital. However, if the smaller hospital was affiliated with a top-ranked cancer hospital, 31% of the motivated respondents changed their preference to the smaller hospital. When asked to compare leading cancer hospitals and their smaller affiliates, 47% of respondents felt that surgical safety, 66% felt guideline compliance, and 53% felt cure rates would be the same at both hospitals.ConclusionsApproximately half of surveyed Americans did not distinguish the quality and safety of surgical care at top-ranked cancer hospitals from their smaller affiliates, potentially decreasing their motivation to travel to top centers for complex surgical care.