A new method to production prediction for the shale gas reservoir

被引:8
|
作者
Li, Ting [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tan, Yongsheng [4 ,5 ]
Ahmad, Faraj A. [3 ]
Liu, Haiyan [6 ]
机构
[1] Yangtze Univ, Petr Engn Coll, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Univ Technol, State Key Lab Oil & Gas Reservoir Geol & Exploit, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Colorado Sch Mines, Petr Engn Dept, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Rock & Soil Mech, State Key Lab Geomech & Geotech Engn, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Ningbo Fengcheng Adv Energy Mat Res Inst, Ningbo, Peoples R China
关键词
BP neural-network; controlling factors; principal component analysis; production analysis; shale gas;
D O I
10.1080/15567036.2020.1779876
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
It is a common phenomenon that shale gas production differs significantly among wells, and it is difficult to find a relationship between engineering variables and gas rate by utilizing a simple plotting of production data against well and treatment variables. Data such as completion method, flow back, and gas production have been collected for 180 shale gas wells. Firstly, the collected data were standardized, and then related or dependent variables were removed by gray correlation analysis. Finally, principal component analysis and BP Neural-network methods are applied separately to analyze the collected data. It is the first-of-its-kind study that was conducted to define the relationship between gas production and engineering parameters for Fuling shale gas reservoir in China. By use of principal component analysis, it is concluded that the number of stages, the lateral length, the distance between clusters, and the average volume of slick-water are the main factors that impact shale gas production. The results showed that stage numbers account for 42.9% of the total variance, while the horizontal length accounts for about 21.4%; therefore, these two factors account for 64.3% among all of the factors. However, the next important factors are the average distance between clusters and the average volume of slick-water, both account for 24.1% of the total variance. The importance of each variable was also defined by the BP Neural-network method. The number of stages and the horizontal length are still the two major factors, and both account for 52%. The volume of slick-water and the proppant size of 40/70 mesh for both ceramic and sand are considered the second important factor and both account for 37%. This implies that shale gas well configuration and treatment parameters are the dominant factors for gas production in shale reservoirs. Therefore, in order to enhance gas production, it is crucial to increase the number of stages and horizontal length firstly and to raise the volume of slick-water by using 40/70 mesh for both ceramic and sand. However, another driver to accelerate production is to decrease the distance of clusters. These measures will be helpful to improve production in the future shale gas development of Fuling reservoir. This study is believed to be the first-of-its-kind to define the relationship between gas production and engineering parameters for Fuling shale gas reservoir in China.
引用
收藏
页码:9856 / 9869
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A simulator for production prediction of multistage fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoir considering complex fracture geometry
    Zhang, Rui-han
    Zhang, Lie-hui
    Tang, Hui-ying
    Chen, Sheng-nan
    Zhao, Yu-long
    Wu, Jian-fa
    Wang, Ke-ren
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 67 : 14 - 29
  • [32] Improved characterization and performance prediction of shale gas wells by integrating stimulated reservoir volume and dynamic production data
    Yin, Jichao
    Xie, Jiang
    Datta-Gupta, Akhil
    Hill, A. D.
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 127 : 124 - 136
  • [33] Integration of Shale-Gas-Production Data and Microseismic for Fracture and Reservoir Properties With the Fast Marching Method
    Xie, Jiang
    Yang, Changdong
    Gupta, Neha
    King, Michael J.
    Datta-Gupta, Akhil
    SPE JOURNAL, 2015, 20 (02): : 347 - 359
  • [34] THE IMPACT OF THE PRODUCTION OF NEIGHBOUR WELLS ON WELL PRODUCTIVITY IN A SHALE GAS RESERVOIR
    Nugrahanti, Asri
    Guntoro, Agus
    Fathaddin, M. T.
    Djohor, D. S.
    IIUM ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2014, 15 (01): : 41 - 53
  • [35] Simulation of the Production Performances of Horizontal Wells with a Fractured Shale Gas Reservoir
    Xiao, Hongsha
    Zhang, Ruihan
    Chen, Man
    Jing, Cui
    Gao, Shangjun
    Chen, Chao
    Zhao, Huiyan
    Huang, Xin
    Kang, Bo
    FDMP-FLUID DYNAMICS & MATERIALS PROCESSING, 2023, 19 (07): : 1803 - 1815
  • [36] Rapid production forecasting for heterogeneous gas-condensate shale reservoir
    Kumar, Veena
    Elkady, Mohammad H.
    Misra, Siddharth
    Odi, Uchenna
    Silver, Andrew
    GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 240
  • [37] Comprehensive modeling of multiple transport mechanisms in shale gas reservoir production
    Cheng, Shixuan
    Huang, Ping
    Wang, Kun
    Wu, Keliu
    Chen, Zhangxin
    FUEL, 2020, 277
  • [38] Impact of commercial natural gas production on geochemistry and microbiology in a shale-gas reservoir
    Kirk, Matthew F.
    Martini, Anna M.
    Breecker, Daniel O.
    Colman, Daniel R.
    Takacs-Vesbach, Cristina
    Petsch, Steven T.
    CHEMICAL GEOLOGY, 2012, 332 : 15 - 25
  • [39] Integrated Workflow of Geomechanics, Hydraulic Fracturing, and Reservoir Simulation for Production Estimation of a Shale Gas Reservoir
    Lee, Taeyeob
    Jeong, Daein
    So, Youngseok
    Park, Daejin
    Baek, Munseok
    Choe, Jonggeun
    GEOFLUIDS, 2021, 2021
  • [40] A new rapid method for shale oil and shale gas assessment
    Wright, Miriam C.
    Court, Richard W.
    Kafantaris, Fotios-Christos A.
    Spathopoulos, Fivos
    Sephton, Mark A.
    FUEL, 2015, 153 : 231 - 239