A new method to production prediction for the shale gas reservoir

被引:8
|
作者
Li, Ting [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tan, Yongsheng [4 ,5 ]
Ahmad, Faraj A. [3 ]
Liu, Haiyan [6 ]
机构
[1] Yangtze Univ, Petr Engn Coll, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Univ Technol, State Key Lab Oil & Gas Reservoir Geol & Exploit, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Colorado Sch Mines, Petr Engn Dept, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Rock & Soil Mech, State Key Lab Geomech & Geotech Engn, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Ningbo Fengcheng Adv Energy Mat Res Inst, Ningbo, Peoples R China
关键词
BP neural-network; controlling factors; principal component analysis; production analysis; shale gas;
D O I
10.1080/15567036.2020.1779876
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
It is a common phenomenon that shale gas production differs significantly among wells, and it is difficult to find a relationship between engineering variables and gas rate by utilizing a simple plotting of production data against well and treatment variables. Data such as completion method, flow back, and gas production have been collected for 180 shale gas wells. Firstly, the collected data were standardized, and then related or dependent variables were removed by gray correlation analysis. Finally, principal component analysis and BP Neural-network methods are applied separately to analyze the collected data. It is the first-of-its-kind study that was conducted to define the relationship between gas production and engineering parameters for Fuling shale gas reservoir in China. By use of principal component analysis, it is concluded that the number of stages, the lateral length, the distance between clusters, and the average volume of slick-water are the main factors that impact shale gas production. The results showed that stage numbers account for 42.9% of the total variance, while the horizontal length accounts for about 21.4%; therefore, these two factors account for 64.3% among all of the factors. However, the next important factors are the average distance between clusters and the average volume of slick-water, both account for 24.1% of the total variance. The importance of each variable was also defined by the BP Neural-network method. The number of stages and the horizontal length are still the two major factors, and both account for 52%. The volume of slick-water and the proppant size of 40/70 mesh for both ceramic and sand are considered the second important factor and both account for 37%. This implies that shale gas well configuration and treatment parameters are the dominant factors for gas production in shale reservoirs. Therefore, in order to enhance gas production, it is crucial to increase the number of stages and horizontal length firstly and to raise the volume of slick-water by using 40/70 mesh for both ceramic and sand. However, another driver to accelerate production is to decrease the distance of clusters. These measures will be helpful to improve production in the future shale gas development of Fuling reservoir. This study is believed to be the first-of-its-kind to define the relationship between gas production and engineering parameters for Fuling shale gas reservoir in China.
引用
收藏
页码:9856 / 9869
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A new method to calculate the effect of fracturing fluid imbibition on adsorbed gas content for shale gas reservoir
    Wang, Ke
    Lou, Yi
    Lan, Baofeng
    Liu, Quan
    Xia, Peng
    Ye, Kairui
    Zou, Niuniu
    GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 229
  • [22] Reservoir simulation of free and adsorbed gas production from shale
    Pan, Zhejun
    Connell, Luke D.
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 22 : 359 - 370
  • [23] Production data analysis and productivity forecast of shale gas reservoir
    Xu, B.-X. (xubingxiang8526@163.com), 1600, University of Petroleum, China (37):
  • [24] Seismic Prediction Method of Shale Reservoir Brittleness Index Based on the BP Neural Network for Improving Shale Gas Extraction Efficiency
    Zhang, Xuejuan
    She, Haiyan
    Zhang, Lei
    Li, Ruolin
    Feng, Jiayang
    Liu, Ruhao
    Wang, Xinrui
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (18)
  • [25] In Situ Gas Content Prediction Method for Shale
    Li, Ning
    Jiang, Tongwen
    Xiong, Wei
    ACS OMEGA, 2024, 9 (14): : 16128 - 16137
  • [26] A New Approach to Calculate Effective Stimulated Reservoir Volume in Shale Gas Reservoir
    Su Y.
    Sheng G.
    Wang W.
    Jia J.
    Wu C.
    Wang, Wendong (wwdong@upc.edu.cn), 1600, China University of Geosciences (42): : 1314 - 1323
  • [27] Development of Porosity Measurement Method in Shale Gas Reservoir Rock
    Siswandani, Alita
    Nurhandoko, BagusEndar B.
    6TH ASIAN PHYSICS SYMPOSIUM, 2016, 739
  • [28] A comprehensive logging evaluation method of shale gas reservoir quality
    Zhong G.
    Chen L.
    Liao M.
    Wang G.
    Yang Y.
    Gao X.
    Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40 (02) : 54 - 60
  • [29] Development of Shale Gas Prediction Models for Long-Term Production and Economics Based on Early Production Data in Barnett Reservoir
    Viet Nguyen-Le
    Shin, Hyundon
    Little, Edward
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (02)
  • [30] A fractal production prediction model for shale gas reservoirs
    Geng, Lidong
    Li, Gensheng
    Wang, Minsheng
    Li, Ying
    Tian, Shouceng
    Pang, Wei
    Lyu, Zehao
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 55 : 354 - 367