A new method to production prediction for the shale gas reservoir

被引:8
|
作者
Li, Ting [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tan, Yongsheng [4 ,5 ]
Ahmad, Faraj A. [3 ]
Liu, Haiyan [6 ]
机构
[1] Yangtze Univ, Petr Engn Coll, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Chengdu Univ Technol, State Key Lab Oil & Gas Reservoir Geol & Exploit, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Colorado Sch Mines, Petr Engn Dept, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Rock & Soil Mech, State Key Lab Geomech & Geotech Engn, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Ningbo Fengcheng Adv Energy Mat Res Inst, Ningbo, Peoples R China
关键词
BP neural-network; controlling factors; principal component analysis; production analysis; shale gas;
D O I
10.1080/15567036.2020.1779876
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
It is a common phenomenon that shale gas production differs significantly among wells, and it is difficult to find a relationship between engineering variables and gas rate by utilizing a simple plotting of production data against well and treatment variables. Data such as completion method, flow back, and gas production have been collected for 180 shale gas wells. Firstly, the collected data were standardized, and then related or dependent variables were removed by gray correlation analysis. Finally, principal component analysis and BP Neural-network methods are applied separately to analyze the collected data. It is the first-of-its-kind study that was conducted to define the relationship between gas production and engineering parameters for Fuling shale gas reservoir in China. By use of principal component analysis, it is concluded that the number of stages, the lateral length, the distance between clusters, and the average volume of slick-water are the main factors that impact shale gas production. The results showed that stage numbers account for 42.9% of the total variance, while the horizontal length accounts for about 21.4%; therefore, these two factors account for 64.3% among all of the factors. However, the next important factors are the average distance between clusters and the average volume of slick-water, both account for 24.1% of the total variance. The importance of each variable was also defined by the BP Neural-network method. The number of stages and the horizontal length are still the two major factors, and both account for 52%. The volume of slick-water and the proppant size of 40/70 mesh for both ceramic and sand are considered the second important factor and both account for 37%. This implies that shale gas well configuration and treatment parameters are the dominant factors for gas production in shale reservoirs. Therefore, in order to enhance gas production, it is crucial to increase the number of stages and horizontal length firstly and to raise the volume of slick-water by using 40/70 mesh for both ceramic and sand. However, another driver to accelerate production is to decrease the distance of clusters. These measures will be helpful to improve production in the future shale gas development of Fuling reservoir. This study is believed to be the first-of-its-kind to define the relationship between gas production and engineering parameters for Fuling shale gas reservoir in China.
引用
收藏
页码:9856 / 9869
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research on prediction algorithm of shale gas reservoir production
    He, Feng
    Xiao, Jianfeng
    Deng, Cai
    2021 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ICIAI 2021), 2021, : 208 - 212
  • [2] A new method for evaluating shale gas reservoir
    Xiang, Kui
    Hu, Hua
    Yan, Liangjun
    Tang, Xingong
    International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 2016, 9 (03): : 1004 - 1006
  • [3] Production prediction based on ASGA-XGBoost in shale gas reservoir
    Zhou, Xin
    Ran, Qiquan
    ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2024, 42 (02) : 462 - 475
  • [4] New Model for Production Prediction of Shale Gas Wells
    Hu, Zhiming
    Li, Yalong
    Chang, Jin
    Duan, Xianggang
    Mu, Ying
    Xu, Yinging
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2020, 34 (12) : 16486 - 16492
  • [5] New brittleness indexes and their application in shale/clay gas reservoir prediction
    Liu Zhishui
    Sun Zandong
    PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 42 (01) : 129 - 137
  • [6] New brittleness indexes and their application in shale/clay gas reservoir prediction
    Liu, Zhishui
    Sun, Zandong
    Shiyou Kantan Yu Kaifa/Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42 (01): : 117 - 124
  • [7] A new sorption-corrected deconvolution method for production data analysis in a shale gas reservoir containing adsorbed gas
    Kim, Joohyung
    Jang, Youngho
    Seomoon, Hyeok
    Lee, Hyesoo
    Sung, Wonmo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OIL GAS AND COAL TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 20 (01) : 55 - 68
  • [8] Dynamic Productivity Prediction Method of Shale Condensate Gas Reservoir Based on Convolution Equation
    Wang, Ping
    Liu, Wenchao
    Huang, Wensong
    Qiao, Chengcheng
    Jia, Yuepeng
    Liu, Chen
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (03)
  • [9] A Gaussian Decomposition Method and its applications to the prediction of shale gas production
    Cui, Guanglei
    Zhao, Yixin
    Liu, Jishan
    Wei, Mingyao
    Elsworth, Derek
    FUEL, 2018, 224 : 331 - 347
  • [10] A Production Prediction Method for Shale Gas Wells Based on Multiple Regression
    Niu, Wente
    Lu, Jialiang
    Sun, Yuping
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (05)