Multi-parametric study of the effect of materials substitution on life cycle energy use and waste generation of passenger car structures

被引：18

作者：

Tempelman, E. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Delft Univ Technol, Sch Ind Design Engn, NL-2628 CE Delft, Netherlands

来源：

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT | 2011年 / 16卷 / 07期

关键词：

Automotive materials; Life cycle energy use; Waste generation; VEHICLES;

D O I：

10.1016/j.trd.2011.05.007

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

Aluminium and fibre reinforced plastics have been put forward as alternatives for steel to reduce passenger car weight and save energy during use. Often-reported drawbacks are increased energy for production and reduced recyclability, and hence, increased waste generation. This study considers the merits of the alternatives by making a multi-parametric comparison of the life cycle energy use and waste generation of three lightweight alternatives to today's all-steel car structure. The 'development level', captured as the percentage of high strength steel in today's car structure, is identified as an important new variable in the analysis of automotive life cycle energy use. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：479 / 485

页数：7

共 16 条

[1]

[Anonymous], THESIS DELFT U TECHN

[2]

[Anonymous], NOTE POTENTIAL COSTS

[3]

BUDINSKI KG, 2008, ENG MAT PROPERTIES S

[4]

*EUR AL ASS, 2007, AL CARS

[5]

*GRANT DES LTD, 2010, CAMBR ENG SEL CES ED

[6]

MAEDER G, 2000, LIGHTWEIGHT VEHICLE

[7]

MANTEN DR, 1999, P EUR C ADV MAT PROC

[8] Fundamental limits for the recycling of end-of-life vehicles [J].

Reuter, MA ;

van Schaik, A ;

Ignatenko, O ;

de Haan, GJ .

MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2006, 19 (05) :433-449

[9]

Schaper S., 1994, PLASTICS AUTOMOTIVE

[10] Life cycle assessment of lightweight and end-of-life scenarios for generic compact class passenger vehicles [J].

Schmidt, WP ;

Dahlqvist, E ;

Finkbeiner, M ;

Krinke, S ;

Lazzari, S ;

Oschmann, D ;

Pichon, S ;

Thiel, C .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2004, 9 (06) :405-416

← 1 2 →