Poor Households' Productive Investments of Cash Transfers: Quasi-experimental Evidence from Niger

被引:19
作者
Stoeffler, Quentin [1 ]
Mills, Bradford F. [2 ]
Premand, Patrick [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Econ, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Virginia Tech, Dept Agr & Appl Econ, Blacksburg, VA USA
[3] World Bank, Social Protect & Jobs Global Practice, 1818 H St NW, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
cash transfers; savings; productive assets; investments; medium-term impacts; Niger; quasi-experimental methods; TRANSFER PROGRAMS; PROPENSITY SCORE; SAVINGS; IMPACT; CREDIT; GROWTH; RISK; MICROENTERPRISES; CONSTRAINTS; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1093/jae/ejz017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Cash transfer programmes have spread rapidly as an instrument to raise household consumption and reduce poverty. Questions remain if cash transfers can foster investments in productive assets in addition to raising immediate consumption among the very poor, particularly in rural Africa. Further, can asset investment gains be sustained over the medium-term after transfer programme termination? We use quasi-experimental methods combining difference-in-differences with matching on baseline observables to estimate the impacts of a bundled transfer programme on asset levels of beneficiary households 18 months after project completion. The results suggest that small regular cash transfers combined with enhanced saving mechanisms can generate asset accumulation among the extreme poor. In this case, the bundled intervention induces sustained investments in livestock assets. These gains occur among the poorest households and are not driven by gains among less poor beneficiaries. A lasting increase in participation in tontines (rotating saving groups) is also found among beneficiary households, suggesting bundled saving enhancement activities may contribute to observed asset gains.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 89
页数:27
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Payment Mechanisms and Antipoverty Programs: Evidence from a Mobile Money Cash Transfer Experiment in Niger [J].
Aker, Jenny C. ;
Boumnijel, Rachid ;
McClelland, Amanda ;
Tierney, Niall .
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 2016, 65 (01) :1-37
[2]  
Alderman H., 2013, The World Bank Economic Review
[3]   The economics of roscas and intrahousehold resource allocation [J].
Anderson, S ;
Baland, JM .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 117 (03) :963-995
[4]   Indirect Effects of an Aid Program: How Do Cash Transfers Affect Ineligibles' Consumption? [J].
Angelucci, Manuela ;
De Giorgi, Giacomo .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (01) :486-508
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Conditional Cash Transfers: Reducing Present and Future Poverty
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Rapport dactivite du second semestre. Plan de travail de la phase finale
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CTR GLOBAL DEV WORKI
[8]   Cash Transfer Programme, Productive Activities and Labour Supply: Evidence from a Randomised Experiment in Kenya [J].
Asfaw, Solomon ;
Davis, Benjamin ;
Dewbre, Josh ;
Handa, Sudhanshu ;
Winters, Paul .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2014, 50 (08) :1172-1196
[9]  
Baird S., 2013, CAMPBELL SYST REV, V9, P1, DOI [DOI 10.4073/CSR.2013.8, 10.4073/csr.2013.8]
[10]  
BARCA V., 2015, Qualitative research and analyses of the economic impacts of cash transfer programmes in Sub-Saharan Africa: Synthesis Report