Examining the transition to agile practices with information technology projects: Agile teams and their experience of accountability

被引:28
作者
Burga, Ruben [1 ]
Spraakman, Chris [2 ]
Balestreri, Carson [1 ]
Rezania, Davar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Gordon S Lang Sch Business & Econ, 74 MacDonald St, Guelph, ON N1G 1M8, Canada
[2] McKeil Sch Business, Mohawk Coll, 135 Fennel Ave W, Hamilton, ON L9C 0E5, Canada
关键词
Agile; Accountability; Organizational behavior; Grounded theory; Project management; SOFTWARE-DEVELOPMENT; SUCCESS FACTORS; GOVERNANCE; PERFORMANCE; CHALLENGES; ADOPTION; CULTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.10.004
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Proponents of the agile approach to project management describe this new way of working as more efficient, more productive, liberating, and one in which the team has greater control. We examine the experience of implementing agile practices within project management through nine agile teams in the financial services sector. Using grounded theory analysis of data from semi-structured interviews, several thematic categories emerge including accountability, team-based perceptions of their place in the organization, human factors in agile teams, and technical factors with the implementation of agile practice. As a result of these findings, we propose a framework describing how IT project teams experience accountability arrangements when tran-sitioning into agile practices. The accountability experience is a result of the fit between the teams' perception of how they are viewed as agile teams in their organizations, their experience of technical practices of agile implementation, and their experience of interaction and exchanges in their teams. We conclude with a call to-wards recognizing the dissonance between different expectations of accountability and a call for further empirical research into this phenomenon.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 87
页数:12
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Agile Practice Guide, 2017, AG PRACT GUID
[2]   Illuminating the role of the project owner [J].
Andersen, Erling S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2012, 5 (01) :67-+
[3]  
Atkinson R., 1999, International Journal of Project Management, V17, P337, DOI [10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6, 10.1016/s0263-7863(98)00069-6]
[4]  
Begel Andrew, 2007, 2007 First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, P255
[5]  
Birks M., 2015, GROUNDED THEORY PRAC, V2nd
[6]   Grounded Theory: The FAQs [J].
Birks, Melanie ;
Hoare, Karen ;
Mills, Jane .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2019, 18
[7]   Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework [J].
Bovens, Mark .
EUROPEAN LAW JOURNAL, 2007, 13 (04) :447-468
[8]  
Bowen G. A., 2006, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, V5, P12, DOI DOI 10.1177/160940690600500304
[9]   Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note [J].
Bowen, Glenn A. .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2008, 8 (01) :137-152
[10]  
BRINGER J. D., 2004, Qualitative Research, V4, P247, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1468794104044434, 10.1177/1468794104044434]