Adaptive clinical trials in tuberculosis: applications, challenges and solutions

被引:24
作者
Davies, G. R. [1 ,2 ]
Phillips, P. P. J. [3 ]
Jaki, T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Inst Infect & Global Hlth, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Inst Translat Med, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
[3] MRC, Clin Trials Unit, London, England
[4] Univ Lancaster, Dept Math & Stat, Lancaster, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
sequential trials; drug development; statistics; tuberculosis; MULTIDRUG-RESISTANT TUBERCULOSIS; PULMONARY TUBERCULOSIS; TREATMENT SELECTION; PHASE-II; DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS; HYPOTHESES SELECTION; SEQUENTIAL DESIGNS; MOXIFLOXACIN; OUTCOMES; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.5588/ijtld.14.0988
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Drug development for tuberculosis (TB) faces numerous practical obstacles, including the need for combination treatment with at least three drugs, reliance on possibly unrepresentative animal models which may not reproduce key features of human disease and the lack of a well-validated surrogate endpoint for stable cure. Pivotal Phase BI trials are large, lengthy and expensive, and the funding and capacity to conduct them are limited worldwide. More rational methods for the selection of priority regimens for Phase III are urgently needed to avoid costly late-stage failures. We examine the suitability of adaptive clinical trial designs for drug development in TB, focusing on designs for Phase M3 and III trials, where we believe the biggest gains in efficiency can be made. Key areas that may be addressed by such designs are improvements in the selection of doses and combinations of drugs in early clinical development and in maximising the power of confirmatory trials in multidrug-resistant TB, where patient numbers and complexity pose practical limitations. We encourage trialists and regulators in this area to consider the advantages that may be offered by these designs and their potential to more effectively and rapidly identify better treatment regimens for TB patients worldwide.
引用
收藏
页码:626 / 634
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Application of adaptive designs - a review [J].
Bauer, P. ;
Einfalt, J. .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 48 (04) :493-506
[2]  
Bookman MA, 2006, 42 ANN M AM SOC CLIN
[3]   Unbiased estimation of selected treatment means in two-stage trials [J].
Bowden, Jack ;
Glimm, Ekkehard .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 50 (04) :515-527
[4]   A multi-arm multi-stage clinical trial design for binary outcomes with application to tuberculosis [J].
Bratton, Daniel J. ;
Phillips, Patrick P. J. ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. B. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13
[5]   Confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trials with hypotheses selection at interim:: General concepts [J].
Bretz, Frank ;
Schmidli, Heinz ;
Koenig, Franz ;
Racine, Amy ;
Maurer, Willi .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 48 (04) :623-634
[6]   Moxifloxacin versus ethambutol in the first 2 months of treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis [J].
Burman, William J. ;
Goldberg, Stefan ;
Johnson, John L. ;
Muzanye, Grace ;
Eagle, Melissa ;
Mosher, Ann W. ;
Choudhri, Shurjeel ;
Daley, Charles L. ;
Munsiff, Sonal S. ;
Zhao, Zhen ;
Vernon, Andrew ;
Chaisson, Richard E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 174 (03) :331-338
[7]   Impact of lack-of-benefit stopping rules on treatment effect estimates of two-arm multi-stage (TAMS) trials with time to event outcome [J].
Choodari-Oskooei, Babak ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. B. ;
Royston, Patrick ;
Bowden, Jack .
TRIALS, 2013, 14
[8]  
ClinicalTrials.gov, 2015, EV 8 WEEKS TREATM CO
[9]  
ClinicalTrials.gov, 2015, EV SQ109 HIGH DOS RI
[10]   Moxifloxacin versus ethambutol in the initial treatment of tuberculosis: a double-blind, randomised, controlled phase II trial [J].
Conde, Marcus B. ;
Efron, Anne ;
Laredo, Carla ;
Muzy De Souza, Gilvan R. ;
Graca, Nadja P. ;
Cezar, Michelle C. ;
Ram, Malathi ;
Chaudhary, Mohammad A. ;
Bishai, William R. ;
Kritski, Afranio L. ;
Chaisson, Richard E. .
LANCET, 2009, 373 (9670) :1183-1189